Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: “Vaccines Reduce Population Growth”.. that’s why they are so active in Pakistan


Right from the horses mouth, Bill Gates states that “vaccines reduce population growth.” Few can now deny what anti-vaccine advocates have been saying for years, specifically that vaccines directly and negatively impact fertility. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will only be too willing to oblige future generations.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is committing 10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the most aggressive decade ever to roll out new vaccines to poor nations around the world. The commitment will also effectively create widespread fertility problems across vaccinated populations.

In the video above, Bill Gates states at 0:11:

“Over this decade, we believe unbelievable products can be made both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get to all the children that need them.”

At 0:20 he continues:

“We could cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that if we have success on it.” 

Now here is the statement straight from the source which should not leave any doubts on the intention of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Listen carefully at 0:28:

“The benefits are in terms of reducing sickness, reducing the population growth. It really allows a society to take care of itself once you’ve made that intervention.

Now why would Bill Gates state that vaccines could cut the number of children who die every year in half and then also state literally a few breaths later in the same segment, that vaccines could reduce population growth. Are those two not contradictory? If vaccines were to cut the number of child deaths in half, then this would only increase population growth since these children would presumably then grow to become fertile adults. Ahhhh…do you see the problem? The only way they could not become fertile adults is if the vaccines were to make them infertile. Then it wouldn’t matter how many children were saved since they could not reproduce, hence the assertion of reducing population growth. See how it all works?

Vaccine ingredients have been known to cause infertility for some time. Two common vaccine ingredients Polysorbate 80 and Octoxynol 10 both have the ability to damage fertility.

Fertility has been declining rapidly since the 1950s in all countries of the world and the start of the change coincided with the introduction of the first mass vaccination programs. For instance, in the UK in 1947, a mass DPT vaccine campaign was initiated and in 1958, the first polio and diphtheria vaccines were brought in on a mass scale for all people under 15 years old.

Vaccines contain many ingredients that are potentially damaging to fertility including detergents like triton X-100, also known as octoxynol 10 which is a known spermicide and has been used in experiments to “strip” sperm so that they are no longer capable of fertilizing an egg. In a 1977 study in the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, triton X-100 was listed in a table of “most potent spermicides” that would produce 100% stripping of human sperm and the dosages needed for such an effect.

Another ingredient that is problematic is polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80) that is in numerous vaccines including the Pediacel five-in-one vaccine given to infants and the gardasil HPV vaccine. Polysorbate 80 is a known sterility causing agent in rats. It caused changes to the vagina and womb, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles and this impaired the rats’ ability to reproduce.

Interestingly enough it is also an emulsifier used in popular brands of ice cream.

Some medical professionals argue that it has only been found to cause infertility in rats, not humans, but the Depo-Provera contraceptive shot also contains polysorbate 80 and it has been added to experimental animal contraceptive injections as one of the ideal sterilizing ingredients.

Baby female rats who were injected with polysorbate 80 at days 4-7 after birth had caused changes to the vagina and womb lining, hormonal changes, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles.

According to the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is part of the United Nations, scientists from the organization are developing vaccines specifically to damage fertility as a method of contraception. A suggested ingredient for the vaccine is Polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80). As it is a preferred ingredient, scientists are obviously aware of its ability to cause infertility.

Far from being mere anecdotal reports, scientists are aware that an ideal sterilizing recipe is polysorbate 80 and squalene oil together, as they demonstrated in this patent for an animal contraceptive vaccine:

“In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin in squalene oil. The aqueous solution glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80.”

This is exactly what some vaccines contain. In fact, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System lists 25 pages of teenage girls and women who had miscarriages after being injected with Gardasil when pregnant, and that is just for one type of vaccine.

So if you’re considering having a vaccine or giving your child one, don’t have any if you intend to get pregnant within three months of the vaccine and avoid any vaccines that contain polysorbate 80, octoxynol 10 (Triton X-100) or squalene (known as adjuvant AS04).

According to Professor Iles, of Middlesex Universitya new cancer vaccine being developed in conjunction with U.S. firm Celldex Therapeutics will rev up the immune system, directing it to destroy Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) which is made by around half of bladder and pancreatic-cancers. Perhaps an ulterior motive was the driving force behind such irresponsible research since scientists have known for decades that any attempts to depress or destroy hCG may lead to permanent infertility in women.

Ironically, the hCG hormone the researchers are trying to destroy is actually used during female infertility treatments in order to stimulate the release of eggs from the ovaries. Temporary depression and disruption of hCG causes a range of hormonal imbalances and is considered a leading cause of miscarriages. Consequently, many once infertile women may suddenly conceive with repeated injections of hCG.

One of the primary reasons that women who abuse cocaine can no longer conceive is because of hCG disruption. Cocaine inhibits hCG concentrations in maternal circulation which affects secretion by the placenta required to maintain pregnancy.

Almost three years ago Bill Gates told a TED conference, an organization which is sponsored by one of the largest toxic waste polluters on the planet, that vaccines need to be used to reduce world population figures in order to solve global warming and lower CO2 emissions. Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.”

Quite how an improvement in health care and vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates is referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial “planetary regime” to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.

Can any of us doubt any longer the intentions of vaccines and specifically the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. When it’s coming from the horse’s mouth, what more evidence do we need?

Sources:
prisonplanet.com
preventdisease.com
vactruth.com

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.

Harmful Mercury Additive Still Found In Vaccines


http://www.longbeachcomber.com/story.aspx?artID=2149

From Issue: Volume XVIII – Number 19
9/10/2010

Kirt Ramirez

Drug store pharmacies in Long Beach and across the nation already have signs out to “get your flu shot here.” But what they don’t tell you is the vaccines contain mercury – the most toxic element on Earth after plutonium.

Nowadays people can receive flu shots that do not contain the mercury preservative thimerosal, but they are limited.

Because of grass-roots movements like “SafeMinds,” “Moms Against Mercury” and others, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now provides some thimerosal-free flu shots. But the CDC says on its website: “The majority of influenza vaccines distributed in the United States currently contain thimerosal as a preservative.”

From consulting with local drug store pharmacists from Walgreens, Rite Aid and Albertson Savon, the Beachcomber has learned they do not offer thimerosal-free flu shots.

But the pharmacists are not to blame for using mercury; they simply follow the federal government’s guidelines. The CDC approves of mercury in the flu shot and defends and promotes the toxin, saying it is safe for use in vaccines and that there is no “convincing” evidence that thimerosal is dangerous.

Each flu shot contains 25 micrograms of mercury, CBS News reported.
Several European countries and Japan have already stopped using thimerosal. Russia banned it some 30-years ago.

It appears the best way to avoid mercury in the flu shot in America is to get the vaccine through your doctor by asking for the “single-dose” “no-thimerosal” “no-mercury” flu shot, the Beachcomber has learned. If you don’t ask, you will be given thimerosal.

Mercury is found in “multi-dose” vials, which allows ten doses to be manufactured at once. It is a cost saver for vaccine manufacturers. When a vial is poked by a different needle each time, air enters and can cause contamination if no preservative is used. Thus thimerosal is added, since mercury kills living organisms. This has been going on since the 1930s despite advances in medicine.

Why mercury is still allowed in vaccines remains unknown. Some speculate lobbyists with the vaccine companies play a part. But media coverage of mercury also plays a role. The media largely fails to explain how poisonous the element is.

There is nothing good about having mercury in the body. It’s far worse than lead and can be toxic even in small doses. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers mercury a hazardous material.

All forms of mercury are toxic but some compounds are worse than others. Thimerosal contains 49 percent ethylmercury, a close relative of the better-known methylmercury – the type that is 100 times more toxic than basic elemental mercury and is found in fish nowadays due to industrial pollution.

Poisonings happened at Minamata Bay and Agano River, Niigata, Japan, where people died during the 1950s from eating fish that was high in methylmercury caused by contamination by factories. Many who survived became mentally retarded.

Iraq used to spray ethyl and methylmercury on wheat seed as a fungicide until people started dying and developing nervous-system disorders later when they ate the bread.

The compound dimethylmercury is even more dangerous. Karen Wetterhahn, a researcher with Dartmouth College, died in 1997 of mercury poisoning about one year after spilling only a few drops of dimethylmercury on her latex glove.

Wetterhahn had trouble pronouncing her words and began losing her balance about six months after the accident, then went into a coma. Her death made headlines and startled the scientific community at the time, showing them how hazardous mercury can be.

Mehmet Oz, MD, of the program “Dr. Oz” said during a show that it takes the human body about six months to eliminate the methylmercury found in one can of tuna after eating it – if no other fish is eaten.

Dr. Oz says on his website, “When mercury gets into our bloodstream, it goes right to our brain and attacks our nervous system. Left untreated it can cause permanent neuropsychiatric brain damage, learning disorders in children, autoimmune disease, and even heart problems,” according to http://www.doctoroz.com.

“Even if you don’t have these symptoms, mercury can still do you harm. It is the second most toxic agent next to plutonium, so experts recommend minimizing it as much as possible in your diet,” Dr. Oz adds.

According to a heavy metal handbook in the Long Beach City College library, introversion appears to be the most prominent feature in persons affected by mercury.

Other symptoms include gastro-intestinal problems, shyness, depression, confusion and lowered intelligence, as the metal is attracted to the brain and spinal cord.

The term “mad as a hatter” described hatters who became mentally unstable when working with mercury for use in felt hats.

Unlike other metals, mercury can negatively affect human tissues at a concentration of only a few parts per million, which is well-known in medical literature. The argument that a poison is determined by its dosage does not apply here.

During the 1990s more infant vaccines were added to the children’s schedule. During this time babies received up to 187 micrograms of mercury during the first six months of life. A typical dose received by a two-month old who received three mercury vaccines was 125 times the EPA’s daily allowable exposure levels.

During that same decade the number of brain-damaged kids across the country skyrocketed and government officials began to wonder if the mercury being injected into the babies’ bodies could play a role in the sudden “autistic” explosion. Thus mercury levels in babyhood inoculations were reduced starting in 1999. But not for the flu shot.

California’s “Mercury-Free” Act which took effect July 1, 2006 also lowered mercury levels in vaccines for kids under three years old and pregnant women – but like the CDC, the State still allows some mercury in the shots contrary to popular belief and media reporting.

What about pets?

William Ridgeway, DVM, of Long Beach Animal Hospital, was asked about mercury in animal vaccines. He initially did not believe it could be in the drugs.

After looking at product packaging and calling the vaccine manufacturer, he learned some dog and cat vaccines also contain thimerosal. Dr. Ridgeway contacted his colleagues to ask them if they ever heard of such a thing. But they had not, he said.
“I felt duped,” Dr. Ridgeway later told the Beachcomber. “I’m sure the USDA approved it, but I’d rather not give mercury to anything.

Mercury is not a good thing.” He said he would now look for vaccines that do not contain thimerosal.

Jean Dodds, a veterinarian and research scientist who has studied vaccines for 47 years, said, “We do not want to inject mercury into pet animals when they’re vaccinated.”

Jonathan H. Salkind, DVM, who is the medical supervisor for Centinela Feed vaccination clinics said: “Clients should have the right to know.”

Pet owners can request thimerosal-free vaccines which are now on the market and the vets can shop around to find them. Ultimately the clients have the upper hand because they are paying the bill.

Meanwhile, the debate continues whether or not mercury vaccines are safe. The government now concludes they are, but other research says they are not. The same applies to “silver” amalgam dental fillings, which contain 50 percent pure elemental mercury and have been used since the 1800s – and are still used today contrary to popular belief.

That mercury is still used in vaccines and dental fillings in this day and age remains unbelievable. It is unknown if President Barack Obama will address these issues. 

CDC Caught Hiding Data Showing Mercury In Vaccines Is Linked To Autism


http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/02/28/cdc-caught-hiding-data-showing-mercury-in-vaccines-is-linked-to-autism/

 

Dr. Brian Hooker, a PhD scientist, has been advocating for the removal of mercury in vaccinations for the past 10 years. He has constantly requested (over 100 times)  documents held by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). As a result, with the help of two congresspeople,  he has obtained evidence that the vaccine preservative Thimerosal, which is still used in the flu shot, can cause autism and other neurodevelopment disorders.(0) His research is heavily sponsored by The Focus Autism Foundation. (4)

In March 2013, the CDC published a study titled, “Increasing exposure to Antibody-Stimulating Proteins and Polysaccharides (antigens) in Vaccines is Not Associated with Risk of Autism.’ (1) Many cite this study without recognizing that it is just a re-hash of the data used in a 2010 study that found thimerosal wasn’t related to an increased risk of Austism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).(2) Many who cite these articles also fail to realize that three authors declared a conflict of interest.

Dr. Brian Hooker also recently published a study in the peer-reviewed journal Translational Neurodegeneration that provided epidemiological evidence supporting an association between increasing organic-Hg exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the risk of an ASD diagnosis.(3) This contradicts the studies cited by the CDC above.

I think it’s important to keep an open mind with regards to health authorities covering up information involving the risks associated with vaccines. Proof is already in the public domain. Researchers at the University of British Colombia have uncovered evidence showing that health authorities, pharmaceutical companies and vaccine manufactures have known about the dangers associated with multiple vaccines, but have withheld them from public knowledge in order to maintain “herd immunity.” (5) In light of this information, it’s not hard to ponder the possibility of the CDC withholding information as well.

According to  Dr. Hooker, documents show that the data on over 400,000 infants born between 1991 and 1997, which was analyzed by the CDC, proves that in 2000, CDC officials were informed internally of the very high risk of autism, non-organic sleep disorder and speech disorder associated with Thimerosal exposure.

What’s also interesting to note is the fact that a congressional record from May 1, 2003 clearly shows information from the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database that there is a very high risk of autism as a result of Thimerosal-containing vaccines. (6) Despite the public disclosure of this congressional record, the CDC continues to maintain that there is no relationship. Furthermore, an abstract obtained by Hooker shows ”increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccine in the first month life.” (7) 

I think it’s also important to note that the CDC and Pharmaceutical companies have a similar “revolving” door like Monsanto and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For example, the former director of the CDC (which purchases $4 billion worth of vaccines annually) is now president of Merck’s vaccine division.

“We must ensure that this and other evidence of CDC malfeasance are presented to congress and the public as quickly as possible. Time is of the essence. Children’s futures are at stake.” - Dr. Brian Hooker (0)

“Apparently the medical profession does not read the safety data sheets provided by Lilly and other chemical manufacturers made available to physicians, pharmacies, hospitals and health departments. It states for thimerosal: toxic, mutagen, allergen, hypersensitivity, alters genetic materials, may cause mild to severe mental retardation, may cause mild to severe motor coordination, all sounds a lot like autism.” Dr. Frank Engley  (source)

To view papers regarding the toxicity of thimerosal, click HERE.

Related Papers You Might Be Interested in Reading:

A paper published in the peer reviewed International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health titled Thimerosal Exposure and the Role of Sulfation Chemistry and Thiol Availability in Autism (8) concluded:

“With the rate of children diagnosed with an ASD in the US now exceeding 1 in 50 children and the rate of children with neurodevelopment/behavioural disorders in the US now exceeding 1 in 6 children, and the preceding evidence showing that there is vulnerability to ™ that would not be known without extensive testing, the preponderance of the evidence indicates that ™ should be removed from all vaccines”

A paper published in the Journal of Toxicology titled B-Lymphocytes from a population of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Unaffected Siblings Exhibit Hypersensitivity to Thimerosal clearly demonstrates that certain individuals with a mild mitochondrial defect may be highly susceptible to mitochondrial specific toxins like thimerosal. (9)

For more studies and to read a related article from CE, click HERE.

To view video highlights from the first congressional hearing on Autism in 10 years. Click HERE. Some interesting info shared in there.

Good video explaining the political side of vaccines:

 

 

I do not believe that experts and medical professionals are foolish or dishonest for not endorsing the Thimerosal autism link, but I thought I would share this quote anyway.

A single vaccine given to a six-pound newborn is the equivalent of giving a 180-pound adults 30 vaccinations on the same day. I think that the biological case against Thimerosal is so dramatically overwhelming anymore that only a very foolish or a very dishonest person with credentials to understand this research would say that Thimerosal wasn’t most likely the case of autism” Boyd Haley, Professor and Chair, Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky. (source)

Sources:

(0) http://www.prweb.com/releases/ASOT/Thimerosal/prweb11598819.htm

(1) http://jpeds.com/webfiles/images/journals/ympd/JPEDSDeStefano.pdf

(2)http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/126/4/656.long

(3) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354891

(4) http://focusautisminc.org/vaccine-industry-watchdog-obtains-cdc-documents-that-show-statistically-significant-risks-of-autism-associated-with-vaccine-preservative-thimerosal/

(5) http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf 

(6) http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2003-05-21/pdf/CREC-2003-05-21-pt1-PgE1011-3.pdf

(7) http://www.ashotoftruth.org/sites/default/files/exhibit_22_-_verstraeten_et_al_1999_abstract_risks_of_autism.pdf

http://www.ashotoftruth.org/thimerosal-papers

(8) http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/8/3771

(9) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24354891

http://www.whale.to/v/haley.pdf

US MMR Measles Vaccine Failing – Vaccinated New Yorker Causes Measles Outbreak In Other Vaccinated New Yorkers


Not Caused By Unvaccinated Children

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/04/12/us-mmr-measles-vaccine-failing-vaccinated-new-yorker-causes-measles-outbreak-in-other-vaccinated-new-yorkers-not-an-unvaccinated-child/#comment-171156

 

Well, its not like we didn’t tell you.  And regular CHS readers know to expect it.  But this time – its different. And we are going to tell you why.


And we have got one to show you.  What is different this time is the mainstream are having to admit it is true, vaccines are failing, but trying to excuse it and still blame people who are unvaccinated – it is truly bizarre.If you really want to drive the vaccine movement up the wall, show them a study showing a vaccine does not work.  If there’s one thing the vaccine movement hate having pointed out to them, it’s when their hallowed worshipped omnipotent symbol of “all-that-is-and-ever-will-be good about medicine, bless its name” the vaccine filled syringe and needle, just plain “ain’t up to the job” and “don’t work“.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science has a publication called “Science” which publishes online “Science News“.  Science News ran this story: Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time 11 April 2014, reporting a recent study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases ["Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011"] writing:

Measles vaccination rates top 90% in high-density cities like New York, but new data suggest even the immunized can catch and spread the disease.  A person fully vaccinated against measles has contracted the disease and passed it on to others. The startling case study contradicts received wisdom about the vaccine and …. could mean more illnesses even among the vaccinated.  ….. she transmitted the measles to four other people, ….. two of the secondary patients had been fully vaccinated. And … the other two ….. both showed signs of previous measles exposure that should have conferred immunity.

Although public health officials have assumed that measles immunity lasts forever, the case … highlights the reality that “the actual duration [of immunity] following infection or vaccination is unclear,” says Jennifer Rosen, …. at the New York City Bureau of Immunization. ….. she says that more regular surveillance to assess the strength of people’s measles immunity is warranted.

If it turns out that vaccinated people lose their immunity as they get older, that could leave them vulnerable to measles outbreaks seeded by unvaccinated people …. Robert Jacobson, director of clinical studies for the Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group in Rochester, Minnesota, ….. says, “The most important ‘vaccine failure’ with measles happens when people refuse the vaccine in the first place.”

So let’s get this clear, the first mass public measles vaccine programme was rolled out in the USA with the exciting announcement that in 1967, yes just the one year “Measles was to be eradicated” [and in fact less as the announcement was in March 1967].

Wow!! How amazing.

All doctors in the USA were told in 1967 that measles was to be eradicatedin just that year alone with the measles vaccine.  This was in a formally published statement “EPIDEMIOLOGIC BASIS FOR ERADICATION OF MEASLES IN 1967 A Statement By the Public Health Service” by David J. Sencer, M.D., H. Bruce Dull, M.D., Alexander D. Langmuir, M.D. PHR Vol. 82, No. 3, March 1967 253.#

This was going to lead to a “one-shot one kill” measles eradication for life for every man, woman and child in the world.

It failed.

They kept on with different vaccines during the 1970s.

They failed, and failed again.

In 1984 they tried again, rolling out vaccination drives in the USA but this time with the MMR vaccine and this was followed in many other countries in the mid-late 1980s.

This failed.  One shot was not enough.

They tried two shots. So all children got a second MMR shot.

And now this paper shows that is failing as a well, with the prospect of telling adults they need regular boosters.  But if that happens with the MMR vaccine, then it is going to happen with all other vaccines eventually as it must.  Pregnant women are already being given whooping cough vaccine.  Everyone is being pressed to have an annual flu vaccine. It will happen for chicken-pox vaccine and many more.

That is a 51 year history of failure.  But it is still the unvaccinated who are to blame according to these fanatics.  These people are like small children losing a game who accuse the winner of cheating, throwing all their toys out of the baby buggy.  But the winners are not winners but American children the CDC harms daily. 

American children and children worldwide have developed autistic conditions in their millions with the amazing figure of around 1 family in every 25 in the USA with an affected child thanks to the CDC Director and employees.  That is vastly higher than pretty much anything else put together including the diseases the vaccines are alleged to protect against.  Of course they claim that vaccines don’t cause autism. “Its a mystery” they say but bizarrely the one thing they are sure of “its not vaccines“, even when it has been confirmed in the past that vaccines can and by leading health officials and agencies through gritted teeth when publicly embarrassed by media attention: Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines.

So when the rare paper comes along which tells some of the truth like the one we report here, notice needs to be taken.

CHS readers know its not news that there are frequent outbreaks of measles, mumps, whooping cough and other routine childhood diseases in highly vaccinated populations all the time.

Last year in the UK health authorities distracted the world blaming the unvaccinated in South Wales for measles outbreaks.  What they were really doing was hiding the figures showing large outbreaks in the 90%+ and 95%+ highly vaccinated in the North of England.  The BBC, which was tamed by Tony Blair’s proven dishonest Iraq War Government, and which saw its Director-General Greg Dyke kicked out for doing his job showing up Blair’s Government, has truly turned into the British Establishment’s “Pravda”.  It did a great job as the lap dog of the Department of Health fobbing off the North of England outbreaks in the highly MMR vaccinated population.  Breathtakingly intellectually dishonestly the BBC dismissed the problem in two words: “bad luck“.  But wasted no time but many words and plenty of broadcast resources with repeated reports over months blaming the outbreaks hundreds of miles away in South Wales on a small minority of unvaccinated individuals with the “don’t look here, look there” news reporting style of the propagandist genre of agenda journalism.

And it is not children doing this but adults.  So its time to tell the CDC, its Director and all its pointless employees who waste your tax dollars: “Grow Up” and stop harming and killing American kids with your failed pseudo-science mumbo-jumbo. And it is time to demand of your politicians to ensure some jail time for the employees.  Are they any better than the Taliban?  One thing you can be certain of, it will only ever be the minions who go down and not the big players – they will be protected, but at least someone will go to jail.

And these people should be publicly scorned and disgraced so they can never hold their heads up or walk among you with pride or honour.

So when is the US Centers for Disease Control going to do the decent thing and develop a proper treatment for measles and end its insane love-affair with the failing vaccine policy?  Millions of third world children die every year from measles despite the vaccines and because they are malnourished and do not have decent sanitation and clean water to drink.  Those are lives that could be saved if an effective treatment for measles existed.

Unfortunately, the CDC will never do this.

To put it bluntly, one too many a health official including one too many in the US CDC need to pay their mortgages.  They need to make everyone see disease around every corner, and then make believe they are controlling and fixing the problem.  The CDC was officially castigated by the US Senate in an official report CDC Off Center” as an agency which“cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease“  but which was managing to spend US$11 billion in tax dollars every year not doing what even its name says it is supposed to – Center for Disease Control.  That made no difference.  The CDC is unrepentant and unchanged and above all, never, ever, wrong. Its more of the same.  Many more vaccines for many more people many more times.

And if you never cross the road you never risk being run down crossing the road.  The more times you do it the more chances there are for you to get run down.  And every time you get a vaccine you have a risk of an adverse reaction, so that the alleged rare reactions [which are much more common but not reported, acknowledged and mostly denied thanks to the CDC Director and employees] will become even more common and probably just as much if not more unacknowledged or more likely denied.

Sure, there are a few in the vaccine movement who openly admit sometimes, but “only-very-rarely-you-understand” a vaccine here and there won’t work and are even proud of seeming to be honest about it. But this time it is not just a “little bit” even though most of them hate to be shown to be even a tiny bit wrong.  Their egos won’t allow it.  Its why they run with the pack, seeing and seeking safety in numbers as if their motto was “sure flies eat crap but 10 billion of them can’t be that wrong“.

They often claim society frowns upon parents who do not vaccinate, saying it is as well it does and, ignoring all concerns about real vaccine hazards, go on to accuse them mantra-like of being dreaded “antivaccinationists“, responsible for outbreaks of the potentially omnipresent “vaccine-preventable disease” when they are just parents worried for their kids, [which is understandable with all the lies they get told about vaccines by people they ought to be able to trust but can't]. 

Some devotees of the UK’s Dr Ben Goldacre, who congregate on his BadScience Forum set up for that purpose, go on to attack, harass and abuse anyone across the web who might point out anything critical of any aspect of vaccines as being weak-minded.  Some go to enormous lengths, even setting up and running anonymous and quasi-anonymous attack blogs across the internet dedicated to the purpose.

Many vaccine activists have really convinced themselves all vaccines are safe and effective and “one-size-fits-all” is a safe vaccine policy. They’re wrong, of course, but that doesn’t make them any less true believers.

Of course, it’s not easy to put the lie to the claims.  For one thing it is difficult to prove a vaccine caused injury and these fanatics know that.  And any figures are heavily underplayed and never adjusted for under-reporting, making those nice tables comparing diseases to vaccine reactions useless.  It is necessary to multiply the figures given out by at least 50 times for any adverse drug reactions as a rule of thumb as adverse reactions to all drugs are ignored 98 times out of a hundred:Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting vs event monitoring: a comparison: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 84 June 1991 341.

Some in the vaccine movement really believe they are doing good as they do evil. Part of the reason that they believe that they’re doing good is because they manage to convince themselves that they are not actually causing harm but rather promoting the “greater good”, whilst keeping quiet about the extent of “collateral damage” with the “benefits outweigh the risks” gambit.  That avoids openly stating it and instead obliquely means the very seriously injured children of the unlucky parents who did believe, vaccinated and paid the price with their children’s lives and health.  So they aren’t the “antivaccinationists” they are accused of being at all.  They believed too, vaccinated and paid the price, a terrible, heavy and most dreadful price watching their child pay for their mistake in believing that what they are told is medical science is science when too much of it is either just plain woo or hype to sell drug products or to bill them for another physician appointment.

And then there is also hardly a medical school, academic, student,  or professional whose medical education or livelihood is not in some way paid for by the seeming generosity and largesse of those nice clean-cut drug company professionals.  And then there are all those government officials who are helped daily with assistance from the same kinds of folk.  And when having your journal paper published, or issuing some official government communique, do you saw off the branch you are sitting on by criticising or outright attacking the hands that feed?  Nope. 

The only people who can do that are powerful journals of the medical professions, like the British Medical Association’s journal which through advertising controls the drug industry’s access to their million or so worldwide subscribers and readers.  Occasionally but only just occasionally the BMJ will “kick-butt”.  That however is only when some drug industry scam or other has embarrassed them and their members and shown one too many of them to be incompetent and unprofessional in failing in their duties to their patients.  And this  because they lapped up the drug industry hype and neither questioned nor noticed the snake-oil treatments they freely prescribed, promoted or advertised are in fact useless or dangerous, like the totally useless Tamiflu, or outright killers like Vioxx.  They have no choice but to “kick-butt” against a steady loss of public confidence in mainstream medical professionals, with many patients turning away to alternatives instead.  Their appearing to “butt-kick” gives them the fig-leaf of claiming “see, we are not in bed with the drug industry” and pretending to look like they are 100% on the patient’s side, when not. 

It is only this plain when it is explained and pointed out what is going on.  One too many of these people cannot be trusted, and their emblem of entwined snakes is in this context fitting, from the Rod of Asclepius and the winged version: caduceus.

Snake Oil Salesmen

Cadeuceus. This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. 26 March 2006 Source Drawing by Rama. Vectorized with Inkscape by Eliot Lash.

And then there are the cranks, quacks, and pseudoscientists that CHS has encountered over the years.  Of them there are a few who belong in the “elite” ranks of the crankosphere. They stick out through their sheer crankitude across a spectrum, sheer persistence obsessing on one subject, or for promoting quackery as science on vaccine movement crank blogs.

One of these elite few, however, does something that’s very useful to medical quacks everywhere, distorting scientific studies to make it seem as though theirs is a superior quasi-scientific intellect whilst promoting junk as if scientific in memes, as exposed here, overrunning Facebook and Twitter with seeming convincing pseudo-science.

In fact, his is one of a specific group of buddies-in-woo forming a small clique who run an entire website whose sole purpose has come to look to us much like it is to spin studies.  Theirs is the “one true faith” and all else is mumbo-jumbo heresy against their omnipotent all-knowing oracles, spinning pseudoscience and quackery as science and then, of course, spinning scientific studies that do not agree with them as pseudoscience and quackery.

If the crankosphere can have a crème de la crème, an elite of the bottom-feeders of the pseudo-scientific blogosphere, it has to be the world’s true favourite crankist blogs of Dr David Gorski at Science Blogs dot com, along with his writings under the Orac pen name with the Respectful Insolence blog (whose best attempt at a witty “literary” quote and by-line is “A statement of fact cannot be insolent” from the world’s all-time most truly excruciating and badly written and produced “sci-fi nerds dream” 1970s British TV show “Blake’s 7“).

Well, we cannot wait, like the anticipation of a first Christmas, for wee Davy Gorski to blog about a very new just-published study.

But small mercies – what entertainment will Gorski spin up for us all over this new paper?  It will be crap but it will be elite crap.  It will be the crap of all crap.  Roll it out Davy, we’re all waiting.

Why parents who do not vaccinate are attacked with hate speeches ???


http://www.livingwhole.org/the-hate-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1483

I am sick of it – this vaccination debate. My convictions not to vaccinate have been firm for six years now and I was comfortable living a low-profile life and letting other more notable activists carry the torch; and then I started seeing misleading t.v. interviews, news stories, and backlash against parents and unvaccinated children. I saw reputable medical professionals get crucified and reputations destroyed for questioning the mainstream norm. I saw laws passed in other states removing freedoms that rightfully belong to parents and individuals as a whole. I saw fear, blame, finger-pointing, lies, and flat out hate being propagated and encouraged by people, physicians, and popular media avenues towards parents who don’t vaccinate, and their children.

This isn’t a vaccination debate, it’s a hate debate, so let’s call it what it is. And when it got personal, I got involved. Most importantly, I felt the need to clear a few things up:

I am not an “anti-vaxxer” or a “disinformation activist.”
I am a parent. Some people believe that parents can’t make an educated decision on this issue, that you should check all of your questions and reservations about vaccinating at the door and trust your physician, that is unless your physician also questions vaccines (or supports a delayed schedule), then he’s a quack.

Despite what you have been told, it takes no credentials, no formal education, and no “M.D” behind your name to take an educated stance on this issue – it only takes a brain…and everybody’s got one. Of course, if you decide not to vaccinate you’ll be harassed and told to pull your child out of public school. Funny how we do have the credentials to educate our children but don’t have the credentials to make an informed decision about vaccines. So put your credentials away, you didn’t need them to have a baby, and you don’t need them to raise one either.

All medical professionals who do not support vaccines are “quacks, hucksters or bold face liars.” This argument might have carried some weight when only one physician spoke out against vaccines; but today, there are so many that its conveniently suspicious that every single time a physician comes out in support of not vaccinating or recommends a delayed schedule they get attacked, discredited, and demoted to “quack status.” I’m sorry but these physicians sat through the same classes. They passed their licensing boards like all of the other doctors, many have the prestigious “M.D” behind their names too, but because they read the research and came to a different conclusion and had the guts to say so, they’re stance is somehow less credible?

Attacking these physicians (whether they are an MD, DO, ND, or DC) is a bad idea. It makes one look like a bully and nobody likes a bully – not on the playground and not in the grown-up world either.

Speaking of bullies, stop showing us pictures of sick children, telling us that there’s no link between MMR and autism, or telling us dramatic narratives of an “infant who almost died of measles.” According to a recent study published in theAmerican Academy of Pediatrics, these messages elicit a “backfire effect” that only strengthens our deepest convictions – which to be honest, are based on a whole lot more than the autism debate. Is anyone else offended that a study was done where these misleading and one-sided messages were propagated among 1759 people to see if it would convince them to vaccinate? Is anyone else offended that these same tactics are still being used on us?

I don’t call this the “backfire effect,” I call this the bully effect. If we’re going to have to view pictures of sick children, please include pictures of children who have suffered from vaccine injuries and death and children who got a “vaccine preventable disease” from being vaccinated.

Thanks, whether or not we vaccinate is now part of the “Mommy Wars.”
As if mothers didn’t have enough things to be divided over, you’ve made it so that wherever we go be it daycares, schools, or playgroups we are ridiculed, judged, shunned, and our children as a whole are blamed for the re-emergence of diseases that never left and for spreading diseases they’ve never had. You made this a “Mommy War” issue when you somehow insinuated that a woman isn’t a good mother unless she vaccinates her child. You made this a mommy issue when I had to kneel down and explain to my three-year-old child why she was being discriminated against. You made this a mommy issue when you supported and promoted the following hateful belief system:

“[On the topic of vaccines.] We owe it to our children–all of our children–to speak out against this dangerous and misguided parenting choice before more are infected with horrifying diseases that were extinguished decades ago. Choosing not to vaccinate is not yet another anodyne trend in personal parenting. It’s not a quirk; it’s a menace—and a growing one at that.” – Bethany via the Federalist Papers

You know what makes a good mother, one who actually educates herself, questions what is put into her child’s body and makes an informed decision (whether she chooses to vaccinate or not). Call me a menace, call me a misguided parent, and blame me for spreading “horrifying diseases” that are actually neither horrifying nor extinguished. If it makes you feel better to fuel fire and spread hate than by all means proceed, as it doesn’t make your side of the movement look very good. I will neither hate nor discriminate against a mother’s decision on the issue of vaccination. No, I will not be part of the hate debate.

In our society we’re taught, told, and sometimes forced to be tolerant of other religions, races, and minority groups, people of different sexual orientations, women in the work place, and of a woman’s right to choose. We advocate bullying campaigns in schools to teach our children to respect others, but in the area of the hate debate, the voice of tolerance gets shoved aside.

In the last few weeks I have seen articles blaming “anti-vaxxers for measles outbreaks,”referring to us as loonies who have brought measles back from the brink of eradication (of course we’ll pretend that measles didn’t hit an all-time high of 222 cases in 2011 and that there weren’t 54 cases in 2012, and 189 cases in 2013).

An NY Times op ed piece suggested that vaccine exemptions should be eliminated. A post on a Harvard blog last year suggested parents who choose not to vaccinate should be sued and held criminally liable for an outbreak traced back to their unvaccinated child…which is funny because I hear no one recommending the same for an outbreak traced back to a vaccinated child.

In a “TIME” op ed piece we were labeled misinformed, spoiled, and peddlers of “junk science.” Article after article insinuates hate, fear mongering, and inaccurate propaganda that encourages intolerance towards individuals and parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. And what’s being recommended by vaccine advocacy groups is nothing short of discrimination and segregation:

We’re told that our vaccine exemptions should be curtailed, that they should be removed, that we should be forced to home school and prohibited from public schools and day cares. What’s next…will my children have to wear a patch on their clothing to delineate their vaccine status?

We all preach tolerance until there’s an opposing view. I for one will teach my children that despite what others may think of them, they are to neither discriminate nor disrespect another human being on the basis of one’s vaccination status.

“Vaccine preventable” diseases aren’t making a comeback, they never left.
In a TIME article the unvaccinated were blamed for “
4 Diseases Making a Comeback.” Funny how we’re blamed for the outbreaks of diseases that never left. According to the CDC there were 222 cases of measles in 2011 (35-56% of which occurred in the vaccinated population), 54 in 2012, and 189 in 2013. As of April 10, 2014 there have only been 108 confirmed cases of measles. According to the CDC, measles isn’t a “deadly disease” it is “an illness characterized by a generalized rash lasting ≥3 days, a temperature of ≥101°F [≥38.3°C], and cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis.”  

And what about mumps? In 2006, there were over 6,500 reported cases of mumps. In 2007-2008 there were a few hundred cases reported. In 2009 there were over 3,500 cases of mumps and in 2011-2013 levels returned to the “normal” few hundred cases reported. Between January 1st and April 4th, 164 cases of mumps were reported. Seriously…only 164? I don’t know about you but it’s looking like a pretty good year so far.

The CDC states on its website that one dose of MMR is only 78% effective at preventing mumps and that “outbreaks can still occur in highly vaccinated U.S. communities, particularly in close-contact settings.” My favorite part? “Almost all people with mumps fully recover after a few weeks.” Please, tell me again how deadly mumps is and why my unvaccinated child is to blame for the comeback of a disease that never left?

And yet, we’re also to blame for the whooping cough outbreaks occurring in almost exclusively vaccinated populations who were vaccinated with an ineffective vaccine that makes one an asymptomatic carrier for the disease. According to the CDC“the number of reported pertussis cases have been steadily increasing since the 1980s.” Other news sources have reported that the pertussis bacteria is becoming resistant to the vaccine and that  B. parapertussis might actually be to blame for some of the outbreaks.

According to the New England Journal of Medicine, even after five doses of Dtap a person’s chance of acquiring pertussis increases by 42% each year. Why didn’t I see this on the news? So, do we have an ineffective vaccine that’s actually causing outbreaks or is it the unvaccinated child that is making all of the vaccinated children sick? I personally think we should make sure before we start pointing the finger. Then again, I’m not a fan of the hate in this debate so maybe we should stop pointing the finger at children and start asking questions. 

Finally, there’s chicken pox. Chicken pox is a very benign childhood disease that affected approximately 4 million people per year and had a death rate of 0.4% before vaccine licensure. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that even with the vaccine, 10 percent of vaccinated children contracted the disease anyway. 

I’m so glad everyone has discovered that the whole “your unvaccinated kid is a risk to my vaccinated kid” argument is extremely flawed if one believe vaccines actually work; but now we’re being blamed for putting those who can’t be vaccinated at risk?

“Recently a 4-year-old girl with leukemia died from chickenpox. People with compromised immune systems have a greater risk of severe complications from chickenpox and may not be able to get the chickenpox vaccine. That’s why it’s important that these people be protected by herd immunity […].”

This was on the CDC’s website and is the typical propaganda being peddled around and used by others to emotionally manipulate, pressure, and guilt people into getting vaccinated.

I personally have a lot of issues with this type of propaganda. Death and sickness are horrible, especially when it comes to children; but we forget that children with severely compromised immune systems (as with the case of leukemia) can’t be around any sick child. Yes, my unvaccinated child could have a virus and be asymptomatic but the same applies to a vaccinated child. A child vaccinated for pertussis could be an asymptomatic carrier for the disease. A person vaccinated with MMR could have the vaccine-strain measles virus. A person vaccinated for chicken pox could shed the varicella virus and cause outbreaks.  Save the last few years (when vaccines became above reproach), it was common course to recommend that a cancer patient avoid all contact with recently vaccinated children because of the propensity of live vaccine viruses to shed.

The chicken pox vaccine is a live virus vaccine that not only sheds but could cause chicken pox in a vaccinated individual – even if it’s a less severe case with only a few marks, this could be deadly to someone with leukemia. So who exactly is the risk here?

If you read the CDC’s “Summary of Principles for Vaccinating Immunocompromised Persons” you’ll find the following:

“Killed or inactivated vaccines do not represent a danger to immunocompromised persons and generally should be administered as recommended for healthy persons. For specific immunocompromising conditions [...] additional vaccines, [...] are recommended for them […] and higher doses or more frequent boosters may be required [...].”

So let me get this straight, we’re being told that our unvaccinated children are a risk to the immunocompromised when the CDC states that inactive vaccines aren’t a danger AND that the immunocompromised should get vaccinated with higher doses and more frequent boosters than the rest of the population? What about Dtap/Tdap, influenza, pneumococcal, hep b, meningococcal, and other vaccines?

“For children who are severely immunocompromised or who are infected with HIV, DTP [Tdap, Dtap] vaccine is indicated in the same schedule and dose as for immunocompetent children [...].”

“Because influenza may result in serious illness and complications for immunocompromised persons, vaccination is recommended.

“Pneumococcal vaccine is also recommended for immunocompromised adults at increased risk of pneumococcal disease or its complications (e.g., persons with splenic dysfunction or anatomic asplenia, Hodgkin’s disease, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, or conditions such as organ transplantation associated with immunosuppression). ”

“Hepatitis B vaccine is also indicated for patients whose renal disease is likely to lead to dialysis or transplantation. [...] Periodic booster doses are usually necessary following successful immunization.”

“Routine immunization with the quadrivalent [meningococcal] vaccine is recommended for certain high-risk groups.”

Other vaccines containing killed antigens […] do not pose a risk to immunocompromised persons and should be used for the same indications as for immunologically normal persons.”

So now that we’ve clarified that unvaccinated individuals do NOT need to be vaccinated with any non-live vaccine or flu vaccine to protect the immunocompromised (since these individuals can receive vaccinations), what about live virus vaccines and those with HIV?

“MMR vaccination is recommended for all children and for adults when otherwise indicated, regardless of their HIV status.”

What about certain medical conditions like renal failure, diabetes, alcoholic cirrhosis, or asplenia, which may increase the patient’s risk for certain diseases?

“Frequently, the immune response of these patients to these antigens is not as good as that of immunocompetent persons, and higher doses or more frequent boosters may be required. Persons with these conditions [...] should receive routine vaccinations with both live and inactivated vaccines according to the usual schedules.”

What about varicella vaccine and those with cancer?
According to the CDC, the only people who shouldn’t get this vaccine are those who are severely ill at the time the shot is administered, pregnant women, and those with a history of allergic reaction to the vaccine. People who have cancer, HIV, or severe immune system conditions should check with their physician.

And what if an immunocompromised person (including one who wasn’t able to get vaccinated) is exposed to varicella or measles from an unvaccinated OR vaccinated person? For measles, one could get the IG (immunoglobulin). For varicella they could receive a varicella-zoster immune globulin (VZIG), and for hepatitis B one could receive a Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). 

Did anyone even read this before they swapped one flawed argument for another? Let’s see, I’m supposed to subject my child to the hazards of 49 doses of 14 vaccines before age six to potentially protect a vastly smaller population of people (who are deemed more important) even though they can receive all non-active vaccines, can almost always receive live vaccines (or have been vaccinated prior to the condition), and have the option of using an immunoglobulin post-exposure?

I am sure there are a few individuals who want to be vaccinated and can’t (though I argue that most people who have medical exemption to vaccines want them) but is it ethical to subject the entire U.S population to the risks of a biologically invasive vaccine or a healthy infant who poses no threat of contracting a deadly disease to the possible adverse reactions of a vaccine? And what if everyone is vaccinated – how do you know if the vaccine was effective at inducing immunity or when it wears off? Will there be daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly titers checks? Even if one has titers they can still get the “vaccine preventable disease” and spread it, what then? Will adults have boosters too? How will we protect those unable to get vaccines from people shedding live vaccine viruses? How can we tell whose an asymptomatic reservoir for whooping cough? Where’s the recourse for those who would be injured as a result of this mass vaccination insanity? Is a physician willing to take legal responsibility in the event a vaccine injury occurs?

Until there is a comprehensive study comparing the health of unvaccinated children with vaccinated children, NOBODY should be requiring or recommending that anyone be vaccinated for the sake of “public health.” Almost a year ago bill H.R 1757 (a bill calling for such a studywas introduced and referred to the committee on “Energy and Commerce,” and it is still sitting there.

Please stop telling people vaccine injuries are rare and brushing off individuals who have suffered vaccine injuries. Vaccines are associated with serious adverse reactions like: Blood and lymphatic system disorders, immune system disorders, myocarditis, nervous system disorders, convulsions, seizures, encephalitis (brain swelling), facial palsy, skin disorders, sudden infant death (SIDS), death, meningitis, paralysis, anaphylactic shock, skin and tissue disorders, eczema, lower respiratory infections, cerebrovascular accident, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, aseptic meningitis, pneumonia, ringing in the ears, multiple sclerosis, myelitis including transverse myelitis, seizure, febrile seizure, peripheral neuropathy, herpes zoster, migraines, neurological syndromes, chronic arthritis, hearing loss, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, neuropathy, and vaccine-strain versions of chicken pox, measles, mumps, polio, influenza, meningitis, yellow fever, and pertussis. For a list of other exciting (yet downplayed) reactions check out the package inserts hereTo view the VAERS database where you will find more adverse reactions reported including deaths, clickhere.

Everyone knows a vaccine-injured child. Conditions we consider “normal” like ear infections, food allergies, and eczema were unheard of in the days of our grandparents. Asthma, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, autism, Crohn’s disease, epilepsy, brain encephalitis, developmental disorders, and neurological problems were also uncommon. So we traded in polio (which according to the CDC is asymptomatic in 95% of people who actually get it) for vaccine induced paralytic polio and cancer via contaminated Salk vaccines. We traded in chicken pox for shingles, anaphylaxis shock, and death; measles for brain encephalitis; and the minuscule chance an infant would get Hep b for rheumatoid arthritis and SIDS. Considering only a few hundred cases of measles are reported per year and only one child dies from measles approximately 8-10 years (if we’re going with the touted 1 in 1,000 number), wouldn’t it make sense to question the MMR vaccine which could cause Measles-Induced Neuroautistic Encephalophathy, seizures, coma, and death?

I am not part of the “herd” and neither are you.
Herd immunity was coined in 1933 by A.W Hedrich who observed measles outbreaks over the course of thirty years. What he discovered was that if 68% of the population had measles through the natural course of infection, the rest of the community (or herd) was protected. But you see, vaccines aren’t natural and they don’t provide life-time immunity, and even if they did 68% would be the number needed for herd immunity, not 95%. Your (and my) herd immunity was threatened the minute vaccines came on the scene.

“The “science” of vaccination attempts to secure immunity without going through the natural disease process. The vaccine-induced process, although not resembling a natural disease, is nevertheless still a disease process with its own risks. And it is not immunity we gain via vaccination but a puny surrogate of immunity. For this reason vaccination is neither a safe nor effective method of disease prevention.” – Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych PhD in immunology and author of “Vaccine Illusion.”

“This high percentage of individuals having long-term immunity [to natural chicken pox] has been compromised by mass vaccination of children which provides at best 70 to 90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration—shifting chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 20 times more risk of death and 15 times more risk of hospitalization compared to children. Add to this the adverse effects of both the chickenpox and shingles vaccines as well as the potential for increased risk of shingles for an estimated 30 to 50 years among adults.” – Dr. Goldberg Ph.D also confirmed by a study in the New England Journal of Medicine

Please stop assuming that all people who choose not to vaccinate do so because they’re “scared” a vaccine might cause autism.
People choose not to vaccinate for any number of reasons including but not limited to, religious beliefs, lack of research and clinical efficacy, dangers and risks of vaccine additives, possible adverse reactions and the higher risk of an adverse reaction versus the disease, risk of vaccine contamination and viral shedding, belief in other methods of prevention, and lack of safety data surrounding the current (insane) vaccination schedule. And yes, some do not vaccinate because they fear that vaccines could contribute to or cause autism.

Wait, vaccines don’t cause autism! Are you saying that because brain encephalitis isn’t a reaction on the vaccine inserts or because you were a victim of the “let’s say vaccines don’t cause autism so people will vaccinate their kids” propaganda? Oh I know, you reviewed the results of the comprehensive study that’s never been done comparing rates of autism in the unvaccinated versus vaccinated population.

Those of us who believe there are safer and more effective ways to prevent disease are not conspiracy theorists, we just incorporated that little addendum to the germ theory that said “germs only live in environments conducive to growth.”
A conspiracy theory is the belief in little green men who walk on Mars and are secretly controlling our every move via invisible puppet strings. What we’re all tired of, is people pretending the American Medical Association has been around since the beginning of time and that everything else is “new age, pseudoscience, and conspiracy theory.” I hate to point out the obvious but the AMA has only been around since 1847. Before that, there were homeopathic physicians/doctors (1789) homeopathic hospitals (1825), and the establishment of the American Institute of Homeopathy in (1841).

Do you know what was around before all of that? Natural medicine – circa day 1 if you believe in God and circa day “the first time the ape-like human got a cut and put a leaf with spit on it instead of a band-aid and antibiotic” if you don’t. Hippocrates, the credited father of allopathic medicine practiced and advocated natural medicine – his motto was “do no harm.” So if you take beliefs from his ideology it’s “medicine” and if we take beliefs from his ideology it’s “quack-worthy?” If anything sounds like a “conspiracy theory” it’s the belief that the immune system requires the administration of a germ to protect itself from a germ.

Just because one doesn’t vaccinate, doesn’t mean they’re “anti-medicine.”
Medical advancement has brought us many things, some good, some not. I for one do not support vaccinations but that doesn’t mean I don’t support the advancement in treatment for these diseases should they (in rare case) be needed. Some of us simply believe there are other ways to prevent disease that do not require injecting a research and clinically ineffective substance that contains toxic additives, live viruses, and can cause a wide array of very serious side-effects into our children. 

Take the HATE out of the debate.
If you want to encourage people to vaccinate than by all means, utilize your freedoms to do so, but bullying, lying, misrepresenting facts, name-calling, downplaying, overlooking, and scoffing at vaccine injured children, finger-pointing, discriminating, crucifying physicians who speak out, and threatening individuals who wish not to vaccinate will not further your cause; it will only encourage people like me to speak out on behalf of those of us who have educated ourselves and are calling for more accountability and higher standards for our children. 



Vaccination is and should always be a personal choice. Everyone should have the right to do their own research, formulate their own opinion, and come to a different conclusion if they feel its best. Every parent should have autonomy over their child’s healthcare. Most importantly children should not be used as pawns in a manipulative scheme to get parents to conform to what was once a noble idea and is now a hatefully notorious agenda.

Photo Credit: The Holistic Doula 

If you gained something from this article, please like it, share it, and follow livingwhole.org on Facebook.

PhD Scientist and Biochemist Reveals Hidden CDC Documents Showing Thimerosal In Vaccines Increase Neurologic Disorders


http://preventdisease.com/news/14/022314_PhD-Scientist-Biochemist-Reveals-Hidden-CDC-Documents-Thimerosal-Vaccines-Increase-Neurologic-Disorders.shtml
The CDC has been shunning the correlations between thimerosal and neurological disorders for a very long time. Although the FDA gave a two year deadline to remove the mercury based preservative from vaccines after the neurotoxin was banned in 1999, it still remains to this day in 60 percent of flu vaccines. A vaccine industry watchdog has now obtained CDC documents that show statistically significant risks of autism associated with the vaccine preservative, something the CDC denies even when confronted with their own data.

For nearly ten years, Brian Hooker has been requesting documents that are kept under tight wraps by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). His more than 100 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests have resulted in copious evidence that the vaccine preservativeThimerosal, which is still used in the flu shot that is administered to pregnant women and infants, can cause autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Dr. Hooker, a PhD scientist, worked with two members of Congress to craft the letter to the CDC that recently resulted in his obtaining long-awaited data from the CDC, the significance of which is historic. According to Hooker, the data on over 400,000 infants born between 1991 and 1997, which was analyzed by CDC epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten, MD, “proves unequivocally that in 2000, CDC officials were informed internally of the very high risk of autism, non-organic sleep disorder and speech disorder associated with Thimerosal exposure.” 

Factually, thimerosal is a mercury-containing compound that is a known human carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and immune-system disruptor at levels below 1 part-per-million, and a compound to which some humans can have an anaphylactic shock reaction. It is also a recognized reproductive and fetal toxin with no established toxicologically safe level of exposure for humans.

In November, 1997, the U.S. Congress passed the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, requiring the study of mercury content in FDA-approved products. The review disclosed the hitherto-unrecognized levels of ethylmercury in vaccines

In July 1999, public-health officials announced that thimerosal would be phased out of vaccines. The CDC, American Academy of Pediatrics, and FDA insisted that the measure was purely precautionary. They requested of all vaccine manufacturers to eliminate mercury from vaccines.

The requests were denied by vaccine manufacturers and continued every year thereafter. 

The FDA does not require ingredients that comprise less than 1 percent of a product to be divulged on the label, so a lot more products may have thimerosal and consumers will never know.

Elevated Risk of Autism

When the results of the Verstraeten study were first reported outside the CDC in 2005, there was no evidence that anyone but Dr. Verstraeten within the CDC had known of the very high 7.6-fold elevated relative risk of autism from exposure to Thimerosal during infancy. But now, clear evidence exists. A newly-acquired abstract from 1999 titled, “Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to Thimerosal containing vaccine in first month of life” required the approval of top CDC officials prior to its presentation at the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) conference. Thimerosal, which is 50% mercury by weight, was used in most childhood vaccines and in the RhoGAM shot for pregnant women prior to the early 2000s.

The CDC maintains there is “no relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism rates in children,” even though the data from the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database shows a very high risk. There are a number of public records to back this up, including this Congressional Record from May 1, 2003. The CDC’s refusal to acknowledge thimerosal’s risks is exemplified by a leaked statement from Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the CDC/NIH-sponsored Immunization Safety Review at IOM. Regarding vaccination, she said in 2001, “…we are not ever going to come down that it [autism] is a true side effect…” Also of note, the former director of the CDC, which purchases $4 billion worth of vaccines annually, is now president of Merck’s vaccine division.

Toxic Effects of Thimerosal No Longer Disputed by Scientific Study

Thimerosal-Derived Ethylmercury in vaccines is now well established as a mitochondrial toxin in human brain cells.

There are dozens of scientific inquiries and studies on the adverse effects of thimerosal, including gastrointestinal abnormalities and immune system irregularities.

Thimerosal, is metabolized (converted) into the toxic and “harmful” methylmercury. And then in turn, the harmful methylmercury is metabolized (converted) into the most harmful, long-term-toxic, “inorganic” mercury that is retained in bodily tissue.

“Inorganic” mercury is the end product of mercury metabolism. Methylmercury subject groups confirm that the metabolic pathway for mercury in the human and animal body consists in the reduction/conversion of the harmful methylmercury into a more harmful “inorganic” mercury which is tissue-bound, and long-term-toxic. Hence, both the originating substance (methylmercury) and its conversion/reduction, inorganic mercury are found.

Based on published findings by Dr. Paul King, the metabolic pathway for organic mercury involves the conversion of Ethylmercury (Thimerosal) into “methylmercury” and then the further reduction of “methylmercury” into inorganic mercury.

Congress Must Act 

Dr. Hooker’s fervent hope for the future: “We must ensure that this and other evidence of CDC malfeasance are presented to Congress and the public as quickly as possible. Time is of the essence. Children’s futures are at stake.” A divide within the autism community has led to some activists demanding that compensation to those with vaccine-injury claims be the top priority before Congress. Dr. Hooker maintains that prevention, “protecting our most precious resource — children’s minds,” must come first. “Our elected officials must be informed about government corruption that keeps doctors and patients in the dark about vaccine risks.”

Referring to an organization that has seen its share of controversy this past year, Dr. Hooker remarked, “It is unfortunate that SafeMinds issued a press release on my information, is accepting credit for my work and has not supported a worldwide ban on Thimerosal.”

Brian Hooker, PhD, PE, has 15 years experience in the field of bioengineering and is an associate professor at Simpson University where he specializes in biology and chemistry. His over 50 science and engineering papers have been published in internationally recognized, peer-reviewed journals. Dr. Hooker has a son, aged 16, who developed normally but then regressed into autism after receiving Thimerosal-containing vaccines.

Sources:
prweb.com
preventdisease.com
ashotoftruth.org

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.

If Your Doctor Insists That Vaccines Are Safe, Then Have Them Sign This Form..give this the Muslim doctors as well


The average person that consents to a vaccine injection, either for themselves or for their children, genuinely believes it is for the betterment of health. What they are not aware of is that even their doctor is likely unfamiliar with the toxic ingredients contained in vaccines which can immediately begin to degrade both short- and long-term health. If your doctor insists that vaccines are safe, then they should have absolutely no problem in signing this form so that you may archive it for your own records on the event of an adverse reaction.

The reality of vaccines is that they are a far greater risk to human health than benefit and always have been. In fact, two centuries of official death statistics show conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improving life expectancy and survival from diseases in developed nations.

In North America, Europe, and the South Pacific, major declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance vaccination efforts for specific diseases.

Whenever I personally inform medical doctors of these realities, many of them are quite shocked with the data. That’s not surprising considering the fact that medical students are still brainwashed that vaccines immunize which is a myth in itself, since natural or “real” immunity can never be artificially induced by a vaccine.

Other misinformed educators also still rely on the myth of herd immunity which is nothing short of medical fraud. It is a shame and embarrassment that brilliant students are deceptively led down the path of ignorance every single year at prestigious medical institutions in the hopes of obtaining an education. These students then become the physicians of a good percentage of the population.

One of the problems we have in a society filled with misinformation about health, is that people sit on the fence. They want to conform to the societal norms ingrained in our minds about conventional medicine, but they also want to stand up for their beliefs and conscience. These fence sitters are made up of those who understand that current vaccination practices are unsafe, yet somehow also believe you can make vaccines safer or more effective. That is where we have to shift the opinions of those who are on the fence and have them fall off on the side of natural health rather than conventional medicine. See my article When It Comes to Vaccines, Don’t Sit On The Fence!

I have previously written that if your doctor cannot answer these 4 questions, don’t vaccinate. Well, if your doctor does make an attempt to answer these questions and a verbal response and statement is not satisfactory for your own peace of mind, then your doctor should be at least willing to provide you with his or her personal declaration of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines he or she (or attending physician or nurse) is about to inject in your or your child’s body. Effectively, this becomes your doctor’s warranty that the risk factors he or she has identified justify the recommended vaccinations with the benefits exceeding the risks.

Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety Form

The following form was adapted from Ken Anderson’s original. Perhaps you can find a physician that will sign it because I have no record of that ever happening:

Download PDF English
Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety

Download PDF Espanol

Garantia Medica para la Seguridad en las Vacunas


PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY

I (Physician’s name, degree)_______________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________. My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________. My medical specialty is _______________

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: _________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________Date: ______________________

=================================================

I’m really anxious to hear back from any readers whose doctor decides to sign this document in an effort to satisfy your peace of mind. I also have a lengthy list of legal professionals who are very curious as well.

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.

Why vaccines did not save us


 

Read on this page and see how statistics are falsified by the vaccine industry and the governments to support their  thesis of disease prevention and elimination of vaccine…

Vaccines Did Not Save Us! Two Centuries of Official Statistics

Child Health Safety has compiled an excellent report on data the drug industry do not want you to see. Here are two centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics which show conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.

The main advances in combating disease over 200 years have been better food and clean drinking water.  Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living conditions also contribute. This is also borne out in published peer reviewed research:

The Measles mortality graphs are enlightening [more below] and contradict the claims of Government health officials that vaccines have saved millions of lives.  It is an unscientific claim which the data show is untrue. Here you will also learn why vaccinations like mumps and rubella for children are medically unethical and can expose medical professionals to liability for criminal proceedings and civil damages for administering them.

 

The success of the City of Leicester, England was remarkable in reducing smallpox mortality substantially compared to the rest of England and other countries by abandoning vaccination between 1882 and 1908 [see more below].

This contrasts how the drug industry has turned each child in the world into a human pin-cushion profit centre.

 

 

The financial markets have known for 20 years and more the pharmaceutical industry’s blockbuster patented drugs business model would eventualy fail  We now see the Bill Gates’ type business model emerging – almost everyone has Windows software on their PC – almost everyone will be vax’ed.  Gates quickly became a multi-billionaire.  With vastly more people to vaccinate than computers requiring software the lure of money is many times greater. All this whilst we watch as childhood prevalence of asthma, allergies, autism, diabetes and more have increased exponentially as the vaccines have been introduced.

 

http://preventdisease.com/news/10/102510_vaccines_did_not_save_us.shtml

http://childhealthsafety.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/vaccines-did-not-save-us-e28093-2-centuries-of-official-statistics.pdf

WHY VACCINATION CONTINUES.. read the Truth


http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020132sinclair/vaccinaion.htmCHAPTER 11
WHY VACCINATION CONTINUES

“The propaganda in favour of immunization has won the minds of the masses and has influenced medical thinking, and government and international measures, relating to disease control. This has been at the expense of methods which might have raised the real level of well-being of the people at risk. This begins to impinge upon the realms of politics and economics, for the gains are great in this area, and the truth is not always palatable. The removal of the idea of protection, via immunization, and the implementation of expensive measures to improve nutrition in countries which can hardly make ends meet, would not be welcome themes for politicians, even if they could be made to listen to the facts.

Leon Chaitow
Vaccination And Immunization

That vaccination continues to this day is not because of its ‘assumed’ benefits, but (1) because it yields millions of dollars profit to the Drug Industry, (2) because it is one of the foundation stones of Medical Science upon which they have undeservedly built their power and prestige, and for that reason, must remain in place, and (3) because the majority of the public, brainwashed by medical propaganda, and unwilling to think for themselves, blindly accept it.


COMMERCIAL MOTIVES

Firstly, commercial interests are a major motive behind the vaccine drive, netting the drug industry millions of dollars annually. Eleanor McBean PhD (The Poisoned Needle) states:

“The vaccine business has continued to thrive in spite of its disastrous failure, for the mere reason that it nets millions of dollars for the promoters, and this buys power with governments and propaganda control over the masses who don’t know how to think for themselves”.

Speaking of the disastrous smallpox epidemics in England following compulsory vaccination, Herbert Shelton (Natural Hygiene, Man’s Pristine Way of Life) stated that smallpox vaccinations were kept alive only because of the enormous profits that were derived from this practice.

Despite the failure of the tuberculosis vaccine in India involving over 260,000 Indians, both the World Health Organisation and the Indian government recommended its continuance. One may speculate as to the reasons why but its worth noting that the World Health Organisation is sponsored by none other than the American Drug Trust. A conflict of interests perhaps?

The Journal of the American Medical Association, November 14th 1990, contains an article titled, British Firm Halts Vaccine Manufacture”. The Wellcome Company, Beckenham, England were forced to cease vaccine production. The reasons cited by the head of their Biotech Division, Dr A J Beale were “Too much litigation and too little profit”.

George Starr White M.D. of Los Angeles, probably best summed it up with this comment:

“Take all the profit out of manufacturing and administration of serums and vaccines and they would soon be condemned, even by those who are now using them”.

MEDICAL PROPAGANDA

Secondly, the medical profession, hell bent on preserving its power and prestige, cannot afford to have the public ever finding out the truth about vaccination. This is not to condemn all doctors, for many simply do not know the truth, whilst many others do not want to know. Yet medical hierarchy, intent on maintaining the ‘status-quo’, feeds the public a constant stream of propaganda promoting the case for vaccination. This propaganda, designed to convince people of the value and importance of vaccinations, takes the form of falsified statistics, misleading statements, public scare campaigns and in many cases, downright lies!

Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics!

Albert Einstein once said that there were three types of lies–lies, damned lies and statistics! It is easy to provide statistical evidence which creates the impression that vaccination works. Here is a good example which appears in the book, Communicable Diseases Handbook by L. Claire Bennett and Sarah Searl from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver. On Page 44 it states: “An effective inoculation program should obviously result in a lowered incidence of the particular disease under surveillance. For instance, since 1963 there have been more than 80 million doses of red measles vaccine given. The number of reported cases has gone from a pre-1963 total of about 500,000 to a total of about 35,000 in 1975″. Now this suggests that the vaccine was indeed responsible for this decline, that is until we go back to 1958 and learn that the number of cases was 800,000! In other words, measles cases were in decline before the 1963 vaccine commenced. (In fact by 1955, still eight years before the start of this vaccine, there had been a 97% decline in the death rate from measles since the turn of the century!) What is more, medical authorities have since acknowledged that the 1963 measles vaccine was a complete failure!

This same scenario occurs with graphical evidence also.

An examination of Graph 1 suggests that measles vaccine was responsible for the decline, but if we examine Graph 2 and go back to 1900, we can clearly see that the major part of the decline had already occurred and that the commencement of vaccination had no impact on the rate of decline thereafter. If you happen to visit a medical library and examine some of the texts and medical journals, you will find that most graphical evidence on the decline of infectious disease starts from the year 1940 when antibiotics and certain vaccinations commenced. Such graphs always present a misleading picture. Is it any wonder that most doctors believe in drug therapy and vaccinations? They have never seen the whole picture. In the Natural Health magazine, July 1988, an article appeared on Vaccination Therapy, in which the author, Shirley Lewis, mentioned this very point. Ms Lewis spoke of a doctor who undertook her own research by consulting relevant material in the medical library. As Ms Lewis points out, “She showed us a graph, from a medical journal, that proved how effective antibiotics and immunization had been in eradicating scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles. But this doctor’s copy of the graph started in 1940, and we had already seen the fuller graph, which started in 1850 and showed that in all four diseases, a steady decline had been happening long before the introduction of either immunization or antibiotics. So that doctor had made a conscientious decision based on a graph that had been deliberately falsified”. This explains the comments of Dr Lancaster (Medical Journal of Australia Nov 1967): “Misconceptions on the importance of direct medical and surgical intervention in the progress of mortality are widely held by historians, statisticians and medical theorists”.

There are several other ways that statistics can be manipulated or falsified in order to create the impression that vaccines work. A common and well used technique is to ‘re-diagnose’. This means that if a patient presents the characteristic symptoms of a particular disease, yet has already been vaccinated against that disease, the doctor will diagnose something else. The National Anti-Vaccination League in Britain provides evidence of this in much of its literature. For example, chicken pox, according to medical authorities is a non-fatal disease. Yet, “In the thirty years ending in 1934, 3,112 people are stated to have died of chicken pox in England and Wales”. The truth is that these people actually died of smallpox against which they had been previously vaccinated. Because of their vaccine status, however, their deaths were recorded as chicken pox. According to The Truth Teller, January 1927, “This has been admitted by English medical officers of health, and the Ministry of Health has twice stated in answer to questions in Parliament that vaccination is one factor in the diagnosis of these cases”.

George Bernard Shaw, the illustrious poet and also an ardent campaigner on public health issues, once stated:

“During the last considerable epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the re-vaccinated cases (of smallpox) as postular eczema, varioloid or what not –except smallpox”.

Explaining the practice of ‘re-diagnosis’ and the reasons behind it, Leon Chaitow says “… faced with a patient who has all the signs and symptoms of a particular disease, from which they have been ‘protected’ by immunization, it is obviously difficult to make the diagnosis they would have made if faced by such a case in an unvaccinated person. By calling the disease something else they are protecting their belief system, and the integrity of the theories around which they have built their actions, such as vaccination …. All this is done to protect a system, and to help to save the public from having doubt as to the efficacy of methods. Re-diagnosis is a real phenomenon, and happens all the time. In the case of diphtheria this was rampant, and it is interesting to note that it was only the vaccinated cases of diphtheria which were diagnosed as something else. In some epidemics the figure of re-diagnosis reached 60% of cases. It is hard to see what sense can be made of statistics when they are based on inaccuracies of this sort”.

Another method of creating misleading statistics is False Diagnosis’. This involves a doctor diagnosing a particular disease, say polio, when in fact the patient does not really have polio. From his book, Hygienic Care Of Children, Herbert Shelton comments on the polio epidemics: “Polio epidemics are very largely physician made. Great numbers of cases of illness diagnosed as polio are not”. Shelton goes on to say: “The apparent disappearance of polio as a result of vaccination was brought about by a clever juggling stunt. Before the Salk vaccine was introduced, thousands of cases of polio were diagnosed each year in children who had no polio. After the introduction of the vaccine, these cases were no longer diagnosed as polio, this automatically appeared to reduce the case rate to the near vanishing point”.

Dr Bernard Greenberg, head of the Department of Biostatistics of the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, USA, has stated that prior to the Salk vaccine, large numbers of Cocksackie virus and asceptic meningitis cases were mislabelled as paralytic polio. Following the start of polio vaccinations, no such mislabelling occurred. Following the commencement of the Salk vaccine, many polio cases were reclassified under a different name, this again, leading to statistics indicating a reduction in polio incidence. Walene James, in her book, Immunization, Reality Behind the Myth, provides figures from the Los Angeles County Health Index Morbidity and Mortality, Reportable Diseases which reveals this fact.

 

Date

 

Viral or Asceptic Meningitis

 

Polio

July 1955 50 273
July 1961 161 65
July 1963 151 31
Sept 1966 256 5

As confirmed in this same publication “Most cases reported prior to July 1, 1958, as non-paralytic poliomyelitis are now reported as viral or asceptic meningitis”. Further evidence comes from the Organic Consumer Report, March 1975 which states: “In a California Report of Communicable Diseases, polio showed a ‘nil’ count, while an accompanying asterisk explained ‘All such cases now reported as Meningitis’”.

Another technique for reducing statistics involves ‘redefinition of the disease’. In the USA, prior to the Salk polio vaccine, a case of paralytic poliomyelitis was diagnosed if the patient exhibited paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours. Yet after the start of the Salk vaccine, a case of paralytic poliomyelitis would only be diagnosed if the patient exhibited paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days! Commenting on the effect of this upon statistics, Dr T C Fry (Australian Wellbeing No.34 1989 p101) stated: “In conjunction with the introduction of the Salk vaccine, new guidelines were established by the Centre for Disease Control for the diagnosis of polio. Not only was paralysis necessary before the polio diagnosis could be made but it had to persist for more than 60 days. This cut the polio cases down to 10 to 15 per year automatically, for that was the extent of the number of cases even before the Salk vaccine. Yet from the publicity you’d think we had 55,000 cases of infantile paralysis a year instead of a few cases with most of the polio symptoms being ‘not life threatening and seldom lasting more than two weeks”.

The Medical Journal of Australia, November 4th 1967, contains figures on polio cases from 1950 onwards. These figures are accompanied by the comments, “Before July 1956, the numbers given are poliomyelitis notifications”and “After July 1956, they are cases accepted by the Poliomyelitis Surveillance Committee”. No doubt this Committee played the same game of ‘redefinition’ as did their counterparts in the USA.

Those who support the polio vaccine have claimed that polio epidemics declined following mass vaccination campaigns. What few people realise is that prior to the start of polio vaccination, the number of polio cases required in order to refer to polio as an epidemic was in the vicinity of 20 per 100,000. Following the introduction of Salk’s polio vaccine, the number of cases required was increased to 35 per 100,000. This would result in a decline of reported epidemics.

Fortunately, the whistle was blown on all this statistical juggling when Dr Bernard Greenberg, North Carolina School of Public Health, testified (May 1962 in the US Congressional Hearings on HR10541) that polio cases increased substantially following mass immunization campaigns. There was a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958 and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959. Dr Greenberg pointed to manipulation of statistics and false statements by the Public Health Service which gave the impression that vaccination was responsible for the reported polio decline.

Such statistical manipulation does not just occur with polio. Let us turn our attention to whooping cough.

In England DTP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whooping Cough) immunization rates decreased from 79% in 1973 to 31% in 1978. Between 1977-1980, there were 102,000 cases of whooping cough in which 28 died. Health authorities blamed this outbreak on low vaccination levels, citing as evidence the decrease in vaccination rates over the preceding years. On the surface this would seem a likely explanation, but if we delve more deeply, a different story emerges. There are several facts to consider.

  1. Whooping cough, like measles, is cyclic in nature, which means that outbreaks tend to occur every 3-4 years regardless of vaccination rates. The British Medical Journal (25/9/1975) referring to whooping cough says: “Periodic increases in incidence occurred in 1960, 1963, 1967 and 1970. The most recent increase began at the end of 1973 and reached a peak at the end of 1974.” This would mean that the next outbreak was due around 1978 and this is exactly what happened. (The next major outbreak in England occurred in 1982 in which 50% of the cases were in fully vaccinated children!).
  2. When there is a decline in vaccination rates for whooping cough, physicians have a tendency to diagnose whooping cough in children who do not have it. As Dr Mendelsohn points out, when vaccination rates decline, physicians tend to diagnose whooping cough “every time a baby clears his throat!. From their book, DPT: A Shot In The Dark, Doctors Coulter and Fisher point out:

    “There is a natural tendency to under-report whooping cough when it occurs in a vaccinated population, and to over-report ‘it when it appears to be occurring in an un-vaccinated population”.

    In the USA, 1982, the states of Maryland and Wisconsin reported whooping cough epidemics. Health officials blamed these outbreaks on un-vaccinated children. Yet, Dr Anthony Morris, an expert of bacterial and viral diseases, found laboratory confirmation to verify whooping cough diagnosis in only 21 out of 84 cases. Further to this, 82 of those 84 cases were in vaccinated children.

  3. Notification of whooping cough is based upon clinical diagnoses. It is important to realise that a similar clinical picture can also be produced by adenoviruses and other viruses which effect the respiratory tract. As Professor Stewart points out (Here’s Health, March 1980):

    “There was evidence also that there was, during this period a considerable increase in other respiratory and croup disease of children, so the possibility of errors in diagnosis and notification–in either direction–could not be excluded”.

    What this means is that many respiratory infections can be incorrectly diagnosed as whooping cough, thus inflating the real figures.

  4. It is well known that the incidence of whooping cough is more related to poor living conditions rather than vaccination levels. Professor Gordon Stewart states (British Medical Journal 31/1/1976):

    “Whooping cough is much lower in incidence, hospital admissions are less frequent, and immunization schedules are often better maintained in districts where socioeconomic conditions are favourable. The reported association between protection and immunization could be an expression of better social conditions and child care as much as of biological protection by pertussis vaccine”.

    In one study on the efficacy of whooping cough vaccine (The Lancet 29/1/1977 p235), Professor Stewart noted: “Of the unvaccinated, a significantly higher proportion of children and cases come from overcrowded homes in social classes IV & V.” Professor Stewart states that of 203 infants admitted to hospital with whooping cough, “93% were from social class III, IV and V, among whom vaccination rates were lower than among classes I and II”.

  5. Many cases of whooping cough which occur in vaccinated children would be subject to the phenomenon of ‘re-diagnosis’ as explained previously. This has been confirmed by Dr Norman Noah (BMJ 17/1/1976) who states,“Family doctors might tend to diagnose and notify whooping cough less often in immunized children than in un-immunized ones” and also by Professor Gordon Stewart (The Lancet 29/1/1977) who says “General Practitioners are much less likely to notify whooping cough in vaccinated children where the symptoms are typical. The figures may therefore underrate the incidence in vaccinated children”.

  6. In 1978, of the 67,008 cases notified no less than 31% (say 20,000) occurred in fully vaccinated children. In fact throughout the 1970s, 30-50% of whooping cough cases occurred in vaccinated children. In an epidemic in Malmo Sweden, 78% of cases had been fully vaccinated (Infectious Diseases In Europe, WHO).

How can ‘low’ vaccination levels be responsible for whooping cough outbreaks when it is clear that the vaccines do not work anyway!

Medical Lies!

Medical propaganda does not just involve misleading or inaccurate statistics, but in many cases, downright lies! And the biggest lies often come from our own Health Authorities.

A leaflet put out by the NT Department of Health and Community Services on Tuberculosis provides a good example. This leaflet states: “Up until the 1950s TB was a common cause of serious disease and death in Australia. Due to an aggressive campaign over the past 30 years and the discovery of effective new drugs, TB is now much less common ….” According to the Commonwealth Year Book No.40, the official figures on TB deaths are: 1921 – 3,687; 1931 – 3,167; 1941 – 2,734; 1951 – 1,538; 1961 – 447. In terms of population count, the TB death rate in Australia fell from 68 per 100,000 in 1921 to 49 per 100,000 in 1931 to 18 per 100,000 in 1951 and to 4 per 100,000 in 1961. These figures clearly indicate that the decline in TB death rate started well before any medical intervention, and that the rate of decline did not change with the introduction of drug therapy. This is the same scenario as with all other infectious diseases as shown in Chapter 1. Medical authorities try and take the credit for the lowered death rate, when in truth all credit should go to those responsible for improving our living and social conditions, for these are the real reasons for the decline in death rates.

In March 1991, a small measles outbreak amongst high school students in Darwin NT prompted Public Health officials to recommend that all students be immediately vaccinated. In fact the Communicable Diseases Director of Darwin Hospital, Dr Mohammed Patel recommended that students receive a ‘second’ measles shot just to be certain of adequate protection. This was in spite of US studies which showed that measles re-vaccination was ineffective. I forwarded a letter to the local media pointing this out and in response, Professor John Matthews, Director of the Darwin Menzies Health Research School forwarded a letter, and published in the Northern Territory News, which stated:“The present measles epidemic would not have been able to happen if all children had been immunized”. Yet only four months earlier an article on measles in the Journal of the American Medical Association, November 21st 1990, stated: “Although more than 95% of school-aged children in the United States are vaccinated against measles, large measles outbreaks continue to occur in schools, and most cases in this setting occur among previously vaccinated children”.

A booklet published by Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, a major Australian vaccine manufacturer, states: “Perhaps the greatest success story of immunization in Australia was the eradication of poliomyelitis in the 1950s through the use of the Salk and Sabin vaccines”. A quick glance at the real figures (see Chapter 1) reveals that vaccines had nothing to do with this decline. Referring to whooping cough, this booklet says: “Antibiotics cut the death rate tenfold in the late 1940s”. This claim is nothing less than outrageous, for firstly, the death rate for whooping cough went from 84 in 1945 to 34 in 1950, and secondly, it is a medical fact that antibiotics are useless against this illness. Writing in the British Medical Journal (29/11/1975) Dr N Grist says: “I regard whooping cough as a serious infectious disease against which our current ‘magic bullets’ are woefully ineffective”.

The presentation of distorted and misleading information on vaccinations and the general tendency of the public to accept this information without question was the subject of Clinton Miller’s testimony before the US House of Representatives on May 17th 1962. Clinton Miller stated:

“In mass vaccination programs, it is common practice to omit or ignore such information in presenting the case for vaccination to the public. There is a tendency to let the ‘experts’ make the decisions, after which they summarize the evidence with such press release statements as ‘absolutely safe’, and other statements designed not to educate, but to inspire absolute confidence.

“We point out that the tendency of a mass vaccination program is to ‘herd’ people. People are not cattle or sheep. They should not be herded. A mass vaccination program carries a built-in temptation to oversimplify the problem, to exaggerate the benefits, to minimize or completely ignore the hazards, to discourage or silence scholarly, thoughtful and cautious opposition, to create an urgency where none exists, to whip up an enthusiasm among citizens that can carry with it the seeds of impatience, if not intolerance, to extend the concept of the police power of the state in quarantine far beyond its proper limitation, to assume simplicity when there is actually great complexity, to continue support of a vaccine long after it has been discredited, to make a choice between two or more equally good vaccines, and promote one at the expense of the other, and to ridicule honest and informed dissent”.

Public Scare Campaigns

Napoleon once said: “There are two ways of moving men–interest or fear”. Probably the most effective way of cajoling the public into submitting to vaccination is the employment of ‘scare tactics’. Commenting on the strategy of ‘fear’ to entice people into vaccination, Dr John Keller had this to say:

“Since people cannot be vaccinated against their will, the biggest job of a health department has always been and always will be to persuade the unprotected people to get vaccinated. This we attempted to do in three ways: first by education, second by fright; and third by pressure. We dislike very much to mention fright and pressure. Yet they accomplish more than education because they work faster than education, which is normally a slow process. During the months of March and April, we tried education and vaccinated only 62,000. During May we made use of fright and pressure and vaccinated 223,000 people”.

From the book, The Dangers Of Immunization, by the Humanitarian Society, Pennsylvania, it states:

“Without question, the polio and just recent ‘swine flu’ programs were based shamefully and unabashedly on FEAR, just as unscrupulous politicians have for years exploited this hidden, subconscious motivating factor within human nature.

“The continual propaganda exuded by accepted scientists and the evergrowing enemies of mankind constitutes neither more nor less than an insidious type of ‘brain-washing’ which we as Americans have every right to feel belongs in some spy movie or intrigue of foreign espionage, but NOT here in America… which of course has proven to be an illusion.

“Therefore, most of America now stands in the backwash of a very subtle ‘Advertising’ which a few recognised immediately as pure old propaganda, a form of ‘brain-washing’, a technique which is based on repeated impressions made on the mind of a person, until accepted as “truth”.

When it comes to vaccination, the public are warned of severe epidemics, deaths and disabilities, killer diseases, maimed victims etc should stop vaccination be stopped. In one newspaper article, the heading was titled “Immunize or Die!–Doc Warns”. Is it any wonder that most people line up for their vaccinations? Obviously most people are not in a position to judge for themselves the validity of such claims and therefore are easily persuaded into accepting vaccinations, much to the delight of the vaccine industry. What the majority of the public do not realise, is that in most cases, if not all, such scare tactics are completely unfounded. For example, many doctors maintain that measles can result in encephalitics at the rate of 1 out of every 1,000 cases. Yet, as Dr Mendelsohn points out “After decades of experience with measles, I question this statistic and so do many other paediatricians. The incidence of 1/1,000 may be accurate for children who live in conditions of poverty and malnutrition, but in middle- and upper income brackets, the incidence of true encephalitics is probably more like 1/10,000 or 1/100,000″.

Discussing measles deaths, The Lancet (1/8/1981 p236) says: “In the UK about 1% of people with measles are admitted to hospital, and one in ten thousand may die … children who die from measles are typically those with malnutrition, or some other severe intercurrent condition, who would soon die from some other cause if not from measles …. Half of the 132 deaths attributed to measles in the first 6 months of 1961 were in children with serious chronic disease or disability”.

In an article ‘Vitamin A and Measles in Third World Children1 (BMJ 1/12/1990 p1230), it states: “The severity of measles seems to be related to nutritional state and intensity of exposure. Malnourished children have a higher mortality and more severe complications, as do those living in overcrowded conditions”.

From their book, Infectious Diseases, by Ramsay and Emond, it states:

“In affluent countries with high standards of nutrition, measles is a mild disease … but in poor countries the illness tends to be severe with a high mortality… this is closely related to the standard of nutrition”.

Referring to whooping cough deaths, Professor Dick states (British Medical Journal 18/10/1975): “Deaths from whooping cough occur mainly in babies in social class V, and in assessing risks one must look at specific epidemiological situations – for there are obviously groups at high and low risk to whooping cough as there are with many diseases”. Dr Kalokerinos believes that death from infectious disease is not simply the result of a virus or bacteria, but a as a result of a biological or chemical weakness caused through malnutrition, poverty etc.

We are continually reminded by medical authorities of the devastating polio epidemics of the 1930s and 1940s, yet in England, the Register General figures on polio show that during the years 1943 – 1953 the average annual number of polio cases notified in England and Wales was 3,328, giving a monthly total of only 227 in a population of 42,290,000 or 6 per million. In 1947, when the highest death rate was recorded, there were 33 deaths per million children under 15 compared with 69 for measles and 99 for whooping cough. In the USA, 1942 there were 42 polio cases per 100,000 and in 1952, 15 cases per 100,000, not only indicating that the numbers were small, but they were well in decline before vaccination commenced.

In Public Health magazine, March 1955, Dr Dennis Geffen, QBE, MD, DPH, is reported to have told the Metropolitan Branch, Society of Medical Officers of Health that, “We are apt to forget that poliomyelitis is the least serious of all infectious diseases with the exception of that one complication, or extension of the disease, which destroys motor cells in the brain and spinal cord and causes paralysis. Apart from this it appears to be a mild infection lasting a few days, the symptoms of which are probably less serious than a cold in the head, and from which recovery is complete and immunity lasting”.

PUBLIC IGNORANCE

Adolf Hitler once said, “When you tell a lie loud enough, often enough, and big enough, the people will eventually believe it”. It is just unfortunate that, when it comes to the public, the majority of people want to believe in vaccination and this is probably the third major reason why vaccination still continues to this day. Dr Kalokerinos mentions a seminar conducted by the Committee for World Health at which he was a guest speaker. At the seminar, a lively debate ensued upon the subject of vaccination in which, as Dr Kalokerinos points out, “The concensus of opinion was that there would be far less immunizing if the public did not insist upon it” (Toorak Times 15/9/1981).

From the dawn of time, it has been a trait of human nature to seek out magical cures or potions for both the cure and prevention of disease. Vaccination serves this need because is satisfies the ‘quick and easy’ mentality adopted by most people in regard to maintaining or protecting their health. As few people are prepared to think logically or even to think for themselves, it is understandable why the majority are so easily persuaded into accepting a procedure which promises them protection from disease, without the effort of having to maintain their own health. Far easier to be given a ‘quick jab’ than to accept the more difficult task of living wisely.

From his book, Mirage Of Health, Professor Rene Dubos explains such behaviour:

“The faith in the magical power of drugs often blunts the critical senses, and comes close at times to a mass hysteria, involving scientists and laymen alike. Men want miracles as much today as in the past. If they do not join one of the newer cults, they satisfy this need by worshipping the altar of modern science. This faith in the magical power of drugs is not new. It helped to give the authority of a priesthood and to recreate the glamour of ancient mysteries”.

Perhaps Mark Twain was right when he said:

“There are two types of infinity: space and man’s stupidity”.


Don’t think that if you are married to a man like pharao that you can’t worship Allah despite the difficulties you face .

Don’t think that if you have no husband like Maryam , that you can’t  be chaste and worship Allah.

Donn’t think that if you have a husband like Lut, alayhis salaam,  that you will enter Jannat despite your rejection of faith and the command of Allah.

Don’t think that your du’a are not answered and Allah has forsaken you because you have been afflicted with sickness like Ayyub , alayhis salaam.

Don’t think that you will not be among the loved and respected servants of allah because you are poor  like Isa, alayhis salaam.

Don’t think that you are stupid and have no Taqwa,  Ilm of the Deen and Adab because you are less educated than others or  illiterate like Mauwla Muhammad , sallaalahu alayhi wa sallam.

Don’t think that you have free will to do whatever you want and superiority above others because you may be wealthy like Sulayman, alayhis salaam.