The behavior of Tableeq Jamaat


A GRIEVOUS ERROR BY A MAULANA OF THE TABLIGH JAMAAT

DARUL ULOOM DEOBAND’S FATWA

TRANSLATION OF THE FATWA

Question: What say the noble Ulama and Muftis regarding the following issue:  An Ameer of the Tabligh Jamaat during the course of his talk said:

‘Now, people are saying that Mu’jizah is with the Ambiya.’ No! My friends, Muj’jizaat are with da’wat.j’jizaat”

Is this correct. In the Qur’aan Majeed in Surah Maa-idah Allah Ta’ala says: “Verily, Our Rusul came with Bayyinaat (Clear Signs).” It appears in Bukhaari Shareef: “There was not a Nabi except that he was given signs on the basis of which people would embrace Imaan.”

Is the statement of the Ameer not a distortion of the meaning in the Qur’aan and Hadith? Is this not ghulu’ (exceeding the limits) in the Deen? Does this statement have any adverse effect on Aqeedah (Belief)? Does it not bring about change in Imaan? Kindly elaborate on this matter.”

Muhammad Qaasim Bulandshari

ANSWER BY THE TAUFEEQ OF ALLAH

 

For the full article click … http://themajlis.co.za/books/ErrorByTablighJamaat08092014.pdfThe aforementioned statement of the Ameer Sahib is not correct. It is a statement of gumraahi (deviation). It is in explicit conflict with the Qur’aan…

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s