Mufti A.S.Desai on stating the Haqq and tone his tone of voice


Harshness Against Deviance and Transgressions

Even a perfunctory reading of the lives of the Salaf-us-Saaliheen will provide ample backing for Maulana Ahmad Sadeq’s harshness against the Ulama-e-soo Mufti A.S.Desai on stating the Haqq and tone his tone of voice (evil scholars who lead others to Jahannum), deviance, and transgressions of the Deen. The following couple of letters provide some explanation for his methodology:

Respected Brother,

Your e-mail dated 12 March 2011 refers. While we do not answer letters questioning our attitude and methodology, we shall go this extra mile to assist you to understand reality.

People who have no real intention of following the Deen,  present the excuse of  ’harsh attitude’ and ‘akhlaaq’ to justify their misdeeds. With this red herring they deflect the minds of people from the problem and the corruption.

For example, when a Molvi  sits in a church under twelve crosses alongside priests and engages in prayers,  these critics do not see the harshness, the lack of akhlaaq and the kufr of this practice. But when  someone criticizes the kufr, he is  reviled on the basis of his ‘harshness’.

When molvies  commit capital kufr by abrogating  the ahkaam of the Shariah with their kufr MMB, people  accept such harsh  perpetration of kufr. But when we  criticize this perpetration, we are reviled for being ‘too harsh’. Furthermore, what you are blissfully unaware of is that our ‘harsh attitude’ is instituted after all other methods of consulting and convincing the miscreants have failed. When they are not prepared to listen  and  meaningfully discuss in privacy, then our ‘harsh’ attitude becomes Waajib, nay Fardh.

Since all of these critics enjoy the haraam activities which the molvies have halaalized nowadays, they try to justify and defend the evil practices and the errant molvies. But in the process of doing so they are unable to refute  our arguments. They only harp on our attitude and methodology. In this way they detract attention from the problem.

Our attitude is commensurate with the crime. If our tone appears to be ‘too harsh’, then their crime is too vile. The attitude is the effect of the villainy of the sin.

Most people fail to understand the permissibility,  efficacy,  and necessity of the ‘harsh’ attitude because they lack knowledge of the variety of attitudes among the Ambiya and the Sahaabah. While  they harp on one dimension of Rasulullah’s attitude, they are ignorant or deliberately blind to the other ‘harsh’ dimension which  dictated even gouging out the eyes of criminals. They  forget that in Daarul Islam the consequence of the type of kufr they are perpetrating nowadays is execution with the sword. We do not know if execution  with the sword is ‘too harsh’ or within the confines of ‘good akhlaaq’.  We do not know if whipping in the public is perhaps ‘too harsh’ or  not within the limits of ‘good akhlaaq’.

Once Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) remarked to a person who looked into the house, that he felt like throwing a scissors into his eyes. Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that hot iron rods will be inserted into the eyes of a man who looks at the beauty of a strange woman. Are these comments perhaps ‘too harsh’, and do they not form part of ‘good akhlaaq’.

Nabi Musa (alayhis salaam) without making the slightest investigation to establish the factual position grabbed hold of the hair and beard of Nabi Haaroon (alayhis salaam), his elder brother, and violently shook him. Allah Ta’ala did not  upbraid him for this act. Allah Ta’ala upheld it. Was his  violent act against his elder, Nabi brother  perhaps ‘too harsh’. Was his action  beyond the confines of ‘good akhlaaq’?

When the Qur’aan and Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) describe  the believers and doers of immorality and kufr to be kaafiroon, fasiqoon, faajiroon, jaahiloon, munaafiqoon, etc., are these epithets ‘too harsh’ and beyond the confines of ‘good akhlaaq’?

Is the halaalizing  and consumption of rotten, diseased haraam carrion a tolerable deed? Is it not ‘too harsh’ to make halaal what Allah has made haraam’. Does ‘good akhlaaq’ allow that we feed carrion and poison to your children? If your beloved child is about to ingest a lethal poison and we who are observing this suicidal act leave the child  to consume the poison because he/she  refuses to accept our soft and ‘akhlaaqi’ approach to  abstain from the poison, will you praise and commend us for our ‘good akhlaaq’ and not adopting ‘too harsh a tone’, when you see the dead body of your child – dead because of the poison and dead because we contented ourselves with ‘good akhlaaq’? Or will you praise us and shower on us other rewards if we had  harshly grabbed your  child’s hand and rudely snatched the poison from his hand and left him  kicking up a tantram like Sanha and Radio Shaitaan?

Once when a molvi  said that he felt like becoming a Christian, Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh) gave him a full and a hard  clout full in the face and shouted at him: ‘Shaitaan! Get away and become a Christian!’ Those who have read the writings of Hadhrat Thanvi can testify to his ‘too harsh’ attitude. So ‘harsh’ was  his attitude and methodology that even The Majlis would not have become his mureed if  it (The Majlis) had existed during  Hadhrat’s lifetime. Was  the action and attitude of Hadhrat Hakeemul Ummat then ‘too harsh’ and beyond the confines of ‘good akhlaaq’ merely because we may not be able to tolerate it?

Hadhrat Gangohi (rahmatullah alayh) said in his fatwa  that those who believe against and propagate against polygamy like the MMB crowd, will ‘hang upside down in Jahannum’; they are ‘kaafirs, murtads, enemies of Allah, enemies of the Rasool,etc., etc.’ Was his attitude ‘too harsh’ and beyond the limits of ‘good akhlaaq’?

Brother, we can write a volume of examples from the lives of the Ambiya, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Sahaabah and the Auliya  to show the beloved ‘harsh attitude’ which  by Allah Azza Wa Jal is an act of ibaadat of the highest merit. You will not hesitate to permit the doctor to treat you harshly by stabbing into your body and cutting you up and opening up your heart to  save you from the disease which threatens to destroy you. Because you understand  physical and worldly benefits, you will praise and reward the doctor who had treated your harshly. But since  deep down in your heart  Deeni benefit is an insignificant issue,  the ‘harsh attitude’ argument is a convenient scape-goat for justifying the maladies  of kufr, fisq and fujoor. But when we adopt ‘harsh attitudes’ to operate on Muslims who are suffering from spiritual cancer and spiritual Aids, then there is a clamour of baseless criticism.

People should look at their crimes and their harsh attitudes of pride and arrogance, not at our ‘harsh’  remedial attitude. The problem, disease and cancer are their sins  while our ‘harsh’ attitude is the medicine and the cure for the malignant cancer which is  devouring their hearts, souls and bodies.

Was-salaam

A.S. Desai

For

Mujlisul Ulama of S.A.

http://reliablefatwas.com/harshness-deviance-transgressions/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s