Even if vaccines were effective, and that clearly always has and can be held to be questionable; does not the CDC and FDA have any responsibility to the public to become honest and forthright about the risks? How about them as well becoming honest about the fact that the science to support vaccines, clearly is not there, and having antibodies does not and has not scientifically been proven to equal immunity nor efficacy.
Without any physiological human health related science nor actually conclusive data, they continually spout the reply that vaccines are safe and effective. How do they determine them to be safe, and what was it that determined them to be safe?
They the FDA and CDC obviously or apparently believe that VAERS is meaningless. If no reports in VAERS have yet lead them to any conclusion that there is a common link to all the Gardasil damage and the deaths; then exactly what would it take to be enough. And they know and believe that no large number of doctors have any list of accounts of the vaccine reactions, and or severe reactions, because they all deny what they see, and find any excuse to look for any other cause of problems, than vaccines. So, they get away with claiming vaccine harm and severe reactions and even disability such as seen with Gardasil, for example; that those cases are rare. Really, are they? They factor in then all the vaccines that have been given, and conclude then that the risks are all minimal; correct? But their actual and true data is missing.
If they factored in that VAERS is known to have only a 1 to 10% reporting factor, and did the math; what should that alone tell them? It should tell them that there are some major issues and problems that they are overlooking. But they again wrongly ignore all the data as coincidental and no matter how closely related the reports, nothing is ever acknowledged as to what they should obviously be be concluding. They simply have put forth that the 14 mostly only epidemiological studies the mainstream references, done on one vaccine, the MMR, and one vaccine ingredient thimerosal, are all the conclusive proof of anything they need, thus so called debunking vaccines link to autism. Autism is actually a comparatively small part of it, in the over-all harm that the current level of multiple vaccines are doing to the general health of the today’s children. This is obvious as well when you see the actual bulwark of unbiased science existing, showing that fact. The same science they refuse to acknowledge, while falsely at the same time claiming they have all the science. Really, where? Where are the actual safety studies and the data? It does not exist.
Did they ever do darkfield blood microscopy on any child or individual, after giving vaccines? Why not? The blood is the life force of health. Now that would be some real science. It would show to much truth, and is something they don’t want to even think about. Oh, there is no issue of potential ischemia, when you are using aluminum adjuvants? Really?
09 Andrew Moulden En 07 de 11
Common vaccines that contain aluminum include:
DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) — 625 mcg
Hepatitis B — 375 mcg
Hepatitis A — 250 mcg
Hib (haemophilus influenza type B) — 225 mcg
PVC (pneumococcoal conjugate vaccine) — 125 mcg
HPV— Gardasil contains 225 mcg in each of the three required doses.
To learn of their lack of data on such as the safety of vaccine aluminum adjuvants; for example, I went right to the CDC documents and read what they had to say; it was absolutely pathetic what I found they admitted to. The adjuvants issue is not the only elephant in the room they ignore, but it is the largest one. Go to that Paul Offit lead CHOP site out of Philadelphia and read what is said there.
Then go to this CDC based information and thoroughly go through it. You may be as amazed as I was as to how lacking the aluminum adjuvant safety data is.
VACCINATION CHOICES – WHY DO THEY MATTER?
Pro & Con Arguments: “Should any vaccines be required for children?
Vaccine’s Safety: A Crime Against Humanity, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Vaccinations, in other words, are not immunizations. They can spout any actually only anecdotal evidence they want. The term is falsely used to promote vaccines based on quack science that simply doesn’t pan out in the real world.
Myth busted: Vaccinations are not immunizations
Method of producing a virus vaccine from an African green monkey kidney cell line
Class 424/205.1 – Reassortant or deletion mutant virus
Vaccines Contaminated with Mycoplasma’s – by Garth Nicolson microbiologist
If you think they have resolved the vaccine contamination issue, it sure doesn’t look like it, to me. They at the FDA surely know now, that they entirely screwed up in preventing the HPV/DNA contamination, now found in Gardasil; even though they in error keep washing it and any proof of the harm. It obviously can yet happen, with any vaccine.
“Designer” Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines
Vaccine market has soared to over $27 billion says new report