Scourge of Salaafism


INTRODUCTION
An anonymous character, self-styled ‘ex-Deobandi’, residing
in England, and who lauds on himself the ‘accolade’, ‘the
Ash’ari-Maturidi crusher’ has written a lengthy diatribe of
ghutha (rubbish) bereft of any academic worth, in condemnation
of the noble Imaams of Aqeedah (Belief), Imaam Abu Mansur
Maturidi and Imaam Abul Hasan Ash’ari (rahmatullah
alayhima), in general, and in particular in vilification of the
Ulama of Deoband who are the chief exponents of the Hanafi
Math-hab whose adherents are the followers of Imaam Abu
Mansur Maturidi who is the Imaam of the Sunnah who
elaborated the Aqeedah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi
wasallam) and the Sahaabah as presented by Imaam Abu
Hanifah (rahmatullah alayh) in his famous kitaab, Fiqhul Akbar.
Whilst the writer of the stercoraceous diatribe pretends to be
courageous with his lambasting, abusing, and vilifying the
greatest Imaams of this Ummah, he portrays his abject
cowardice with his anonymity. A person who has assumed on
himself the satanic venture of vilifying and refuting the greatest
authorities of the Shariah, is not supposed to conceal himself in a
fortress of anonymity. One who sallies forth into the domain of
academic criticism, especially when it is directed at some of the
greatest Warathah (Heirs) and Representatives of Rasulullah
(sallallahu alayhi wasallam), should not squeak like a mouse. He
is supposed to remove his mask of cowardice to expose his
obnoxious face, and to bare his poisonous fangs to all and
sundry. His cowardice which spawned his anonymity, testifies to
the garbage he has unloaded and the rot he has excreted in his
63-page diatribe of jahaalat. Indeed the miserable traitor
wallows in a cesspool of iniquity.
It is abundantly clear from the manner of his acquittal in his
diatribe of jahaalat, that he is divinely accursed, coming within
the scope of the Qur’aanic aayat:

And, Allah casts rijs (filth) on those who have no Aql
(intelligence).”
When Allah Ta’ala vermiculates a brain with RIJS, the
repository of such a deranged mind, displays his stark nescience
of the subject he undertakes to comment on without realizing his
accursed stupidity and what a fool he makes of himself. Men of
sound Knowledge are not prone to deglutition of the rubbish he
has disgorged in his panegyric discourse hailing the
anthropomorphist ideology which demotes Allah Ta’ala, Rabbul
Izzat, down to the level of a physical idol –Nauthubillaah!
In view of his attributes of cowardice, anonymity and
divinely inflicted rijs, the authors (viz., Mujlisul Ulama) have
awarded him the distinguished title of Coprocreep. It is with
this ‘distinguished’ title that this miserable coward who has
deemed it appropriate to heap criticism and insult on the greatest
Auliya and Ulama of this Ummah, is painted. He should thus
take notice of the Divine Ultimatum of War. In a Hadith-e-
Qudsi, Allah Azza Wa Jal warns:
“He who causes distress to My Wali, verily I give him notice of
war.”
In the name of the Deen, the cowardly coprocreep has
assumed the satanic task of vilifying the Aqeedah of the Ahlus
Sunnah Wal Jama’ah, which comprises the Math-habs of Imaam
Abu Hanifah, Imaam Maalik, Imaam Shaafi’, and Imaam
Ahmad Bin Hambal (rahmatullah alayhim).
The coprocreep Salafi perpetrates the colossal deception of
portraying himself as a follower of the Math-hab of Imaam
Ahmad Bin Hambal (rahmatullah alayh). In his preposterous
claim of deception he does nothing but brings disrepute to the
Math-hab of Imaam Hambal (rahmatullah alayh) in the same
way as did his infamous imams of anthropomorphism., namely,
Ibn Taimiyyah, Zaaghuni, Daarimi, Ibn Khuzaimah and others
of their anthropomorphal ilk. In his claim of palpable falsehood
he follows in the footsteps of the anthropomorphists of several

centuries ago, who had also contended to be among the
Hanaabilah whilst nothing of their belief coincides with the
Aqeedah of the Hanaabilah.
Ibn Taimiyyah, the Imaam of the deviant Salafis, whose
Aqeedah spawns anthropomorphism, had also claimed to be a
Hambali. Similarly, Abu Abdullah Bin Haamid, Al-Qaadhi Abu
Ya’la, and Ibnuz Zaaghuni had also laid claim to be among the
Hanaabilah whilst in reality they were anthropomorphists
ascribing physical form and body to Allah Azza Wa Jal.
Exposing the coprocreeps who masqueraded as Hanaabilah,
Imaam Ibnul Jauzi – a 5th century authority of the Hambali
Math-hab – said:
“I have seen some of our Ashaab (of the Hanaabilah) expressing
themselves in the Usool (in matters of Belief) with what is
improper. They inclined to writing (books). Three of them are
Abu Abdullah Bin Haamid, his companion Al-Qaadhi and Ibnuz
Zaaghuni. Thus, they wrote books which disgraced the Mathhab
(of Imaam Ahmad). I have seen them descend to the level of
the (ignorant) masses. They interpreted the Sifaat (Allah’s
Attributes) literally…Thus, they affirmed for Allah Ta’ala a
(physical) form and face in addition to His Zaat (Being). They
affirmed for Him two (physical) eyes, a mouth, lips, jaws, two
hands, fingers, palms, a thigh and two legs. Then they said: ‘We
did not hear of the mention of a head (for Allah Ta’ala).’ They
even said: ‘It is that He (physically) touches and can be
touched……’ They interpreted according to the literal meanings
the Names and the Attributes…….I said to them: ‘O our Ashaab!
You (are supposed to be) the Companions of narration (Naql)
and your great Imaam is Ahmad Bin Hambal and he was under
the whip (of torture) saying: ‘How can I say that which has not
been narrated?’ Therefore beware of innovating into his Mathhab
that which is not of it…….Do not interpolate into the Mathhab
of this illustrious pious man of the Salaf (i.e. Imaam Ahmad)
what is not of it (of his Math-hab). You have cloaked this Mathhab
(of the Hanaabilah) with something extremely ugly so much

so that it cannot be said to be Hambali. Rather it is Mujassami
(anthropomorphism).
Verily, Abu Muhammad Taimeemi said regarding some of your
leaders: ‘Certainly, they have disgraced the Math-hab (of
Imaam Ahmad) with such ugly villainy which cannot be washed
until the Day of Qiyaamah.’”

Excerpt of the book Scoure of Salaafism part 1 by Mujlis ul Ulema south africa

 

ScourgeOfSalafiismBookletpart1_Eread

 

INTRODUCTION
This is the second part of our Refutation of the anonymous
Coprocreep who had deemed it honourable to hurl his baseless
vituperation against the illustrious Hanafi, Imaam Abu Mansur
Maturidi, and against the Ulama of Deoband.
The harsh stance we have adopted in the process of
demolishing the baatil and the slanders of the coprocreep is
occasioned by his diatribe of insult against Imaam Maturidi and
the Ulama of Deoband. We warn him that those who live in
glass houses should not throw stones, for they will find in
response rocks to shatter their abodes of glass.
Throughout his diatribe, the coprocreep has painfully, but
abortively, struggled with cunning, lacking in dexterity, to
establish his false objective of creating the notion that the
beliefs of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah, which the Salafi
anthropomorphists refute are the products of the Ulama of
Deoband.
For example, the belief that Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi
wasallam) is alive in his Grave, and that Nabi Isaa (alayhis
salaam) will be buried alongside our Nabi (sallallahu alayhi
wasallam), and many other beliefs, were all extant in the Ummah
since the era of Khairul Quroon (the First three noble ages of
Islam). However, the coprocreep has dishonestly and most
despicably laboured to promote the idea that all these beliefs are
innovations of the Ulama of Deoband.
Every belief propounded by the Ulama of Deoband has been
inherited from the Salaf-e-Saaliheen. The beliefs of the Ulama of
Deoband are antique. They are not innovatory. The coprocreep
has failed in his miserable attempt to conceal this fact.
Many centuries prior to the advent of the Ulama of Deoband,
the Arab Ulama as well as other Ulama have severely criticized
and condemned the Salafi’s Imaam Ibn Taimiyyah who is
blindly followed by all the Salafis of our age.

Muslims should be on their guard against Salafis. They
operate like Shiahs, with stealth, cunning and deceit. Their
strategy is to lure unsuspecting, unwary and ignorant Muslims
into their tentacles of anthropomorphism and kufr. For
achieving this purpose they have fabricated the slogan: “The
Qur’aan and the Sunnah.” But they submit both the Qur’aan and
the Sunnah to their weird and baatil interpretation. They
structure their creed of anthropomorphism on the spurious basis
of ta’weel baatil (baseless interpretation).
A deceptive feature of these Hashawi Salafis is their overt
denial of being anthropomorphists. Their denial is false. In the
final analysis of Ibn Taimiyya’s copro-kufr opinions, Allah Azza
Wa Jal is stripped of His Attributes (Sifaat) and rendered
impotent. In terms of Ibn Taimiyya’s conception of Allah Azza
Wa Jal and the universe, Allah Ta’ala is NOT the Creator of the
universe nor of the Arsh nor of billions of created objects. All
aspects of Allah’s creation, according to Ibn Taimiyyah, are coeternal
with Allah Ta’ala. They are uncreated in their genus and
have eternally existed along with Allah Azza Wa Jal.
Since the Arsh and the universe, for example, are eternal, their
destruction is impossible. In simple terms, since Allah Ta’ala is
not the Creator in terms of Ibn Taimiyya’s copro-kufr eternity
of the universe theory, He lacks the power to annihilate these
objects and entities which we all believe are the creations of
Allah Ta’ala, and which have temporal origins, having come
into existence after having been non-existent. May Allah Ta’ala
save us all from such perfidy amd stark kufr. We do hope that
Ibn Taimiyyah had propounded his kufr concepts whilst he was
afflicted with mental derangement, for this will then absolve
him.
More articles and treatises in refutation of Salafi beliefs and
teachings shall be forthcoming, Insha-Allah. The coprocreep’s
diatribe and calumnies against the Ulama of Deoband have
alerted us to the scourge of Salafi’ism in our midst.

Excerpt of the book Scsourgfe f Salaafism part 2 by Mujlis ul ulema south africa

ScourgeOfSalafiismBookletpart2_Eread

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s